Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25729459›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2015

Dissemination of an evidence-based treatment for cancer patients: training is the necessary first step.

Brittany M Brothers, Kristen M Carpenter, Rebecca A Shelby, Lisa M Thornton, Georita M Frierson, Kyle L Patterson, Barbara L Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Replicating dissemination and identifying mechanisms of implementation of an empirically supported treatment.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting implementation of an empirically supported treatment for cancer patients using the theory of planned behavior.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brittany M BrothersDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA.
Kristen M CarpenterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA.
Rebecca A ShelbyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC USA.
Lisa M ThorntonDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA.
Georita M FriersonDepartment of Psychology, Howard University, Washington, DC USA.
Kyle L PattersonDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA.
Barbara L AndersenDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA.

Funding

Biobehavioral Responses to CancerK05CA098133 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSEN, BARBARA L. · 2004 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA098133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based psychological treatments (EBTs) for cancer patients have not been disseminated in part due to lack of available training. The biobehavioral intervention (BBI) is an EBT designed to alleviate cancer stress and enhance coping. The current study evaluates a training program and uses the Theory of Planned Behavior (TpB) to analyze factors related to intentions to implement BBI. Mental health providers (n = 62) attended a training for BBI. Attendees' supervisors (n = 40) were later surveyed. Repeated measure ANOVAs assessed change over time in knowledge gains, attitudes towards EBTs/BBI, and self-efficacy. Linear multiple regression analyses assessed relationships between these factors and implementation intentions. BBI knowledge and attitude scores increased from pre- to post-training (ps < 0.01). Significant predictors in the final model were BBI-specific attitudes and self-efficacy (ps < 0.05). The BBI training program was an effective dissemination vehicle. Intervention-specific attitudes and self-efficacy were key factors in predicting providers' implementation intentions.

Indexed as

Biobehavioral interventionCancerContinuing educationFrom Cancer to Health™Theory of Planned BehaviorTraining

Identifiers

PMID25729459
PMCPMC4332903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.