ArticleClinical epigenetics2015
DNA methylation-based subtype prediction for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulation of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Trial
- Shared and Unique Patterns of DNA Methylation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Primary Sjögren's Syndrome.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Trial
- DNA methylation-based classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms.Blood advances · 2026Article
- The impact of periconceptional folate on the DNA methylome of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Data-driven discovery of gene expression markers distinguishing pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia subtypes.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Epigenome-Wide Profiling Reveals Distinctive DNA Methylation Signatures and Potential Prognostic Biomarkers in Mexican Pediatric B-ALL.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Rapid epigenomic classification of acute leukemia.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Age-Driven Genetic and Epigenetic Heterogeneity in B-ALL.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Direct genetic transformation bypasses tumor-associated DNA methylation alterations.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Polyamines at the crossroad between cell metabolism and epigenetic regulation in acute leukemias.Cell death discovery · 2025Review
- Expression and prognostic value of estrogen-related receptor β alternative splicing isoforms in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Molecular subgroups of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults treated according to pediatric-based GMALL protocols.Leukemia · 2024Article
- Refining risk prediction in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia through DNA methylation profiling.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- From early methods for DNA diagnostics to genomes and epigenomes at high resolution during four decades - a personal perspective.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2024Review
- Multimodal classification of molecular subtypes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Article
- Hyperdiploidy: the longest known, most prevalent, and most enigmatic form of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children.Leukemia · 2022Review
- DNA methylation at birth in monozygotic twins discordant for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Nature communications · 2022Article
- The Pleiotropy ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- ALLSorts: an RNA-Seq subtype classifier for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Blood advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe present a method that utilizes DNA methylation profiling for prediction of the cytogenetic subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells from pediatric ALL patients. The primary aim of our study was to improve risk stratification of ALL patients into treatment groups using DNA methylation as a complement to current diagnostic methods. A secondary aim was to gain insight into the functional role of DNA methylation in ALL.
resultsWe used the methylation status of ~450,000 CpG sites in 546 well-characterized patients with T-ALL or seven recurrent B-cell precursor ALL subtypes to design and validate sensitive and accurate DNA methylation classifiers. After repeated cross-validation, a final classifier was derived that consisted of only 246 CpG sites. The mean sensitivity and specificity of the classifier across the known subtypes was 0.90 and 0.99, respectively. We then used DNA methylation classification to screen for subtype membership of 210 patients with undefined karyotype (normal or no result) or non-recurrent cytogenetic aberrations ('other' subtype). Nearly half (n = 106) of the patients lacking cytogenetic subgrouping displayed highly similar methylation profiles as the patients in the known recurrent groups. We verified the subtype of 20% of the newly classified patients by examination of diagnostic karyotypes, array-based copy number analysis, and detection of fusion genes by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). Using RNA-seq data from ALL patients where cytogenetic subtype and DNA methylation classification did not agree, we discovered several novel fusion genes involving ETV6, RUNX1, and PAX5.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that DNA methylation profiling contributes to the clarification of the heterogeneity in cytogenetically undefined ALL patient groups and could be implemented as a complementary method for diagnosis of ALL. The results of our study provide clues to the origin and development of leukemic transformation. The methylation status of the CpG sites constituting the classifiers also highlight relevant biological characteristics in otherwise unclassified ALL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.