Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25729328›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2014

EGF +61A/G polymorphism contributes to increased gastric cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Qiliu Peng, Shan Li, Xue Qin, Xianjun Lao, Zhiping Chen, Xiaolian Zhang, Junqiang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiliu PengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi China.
Shan LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi China.
Xue QinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi China.
Xianjun LaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi China.
Zhiping ChenDepartment of Occupational Health and Environmental Health, School of Public Health at Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi China.
Xiaolian ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi China.
Junqiang ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021 Guangxi China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidermal growth factor (EGF) plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and tumorigenesis of epithelial tissues. Variation of the EGF +61A/G (rs4444903) can lead to an alteration in EGF production and/or activity, which may result in individual susceptibility to gastric cancer. Studies investigating the association between EGF +61A/G polymorphism and gastric cancer risk produced inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to quantitatively summarize the evidence for such an association.

methodsEligible studies on the association between EGF +61A/G polymorphism and gastric cancer risk were identified by search of electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM). Data were extracted by two independent authors and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Metaregression and subgroup analyses were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity.

resultsFinally, six case-control studies with 1547 gastric cancer cases and 2762 controls were eventually identified. Overall, significant increased gastric cancer risk was found when all studies were pooled in the meta-analysis (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.438, 95% CI 1.021-2.025, P = 0.038; GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.256, 95% CI 1.025-1.539, P = 0.028; GG vs. AG + AA: OR = 1.265, 95% CI 1.002-1.596, P = 0.048). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, source of control, study quality, and HWE in controls, significant increased gastric cancer risk was observed in Asians, population-based studies, high quality studies, and studies consistent with HWE. In subgroup analysis according to tumor location, and histological type, significant association was observed in all subgroups.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggested that the EGF +61A/G polymorphism contributes to increased gastric cancer risk, especially in Asian populations. Further well-designed studies based on large sample size in diverse populations are needed to confirm this association.

Indexed as

Epidermal growth factorGastric cancerMeta-analysisPolymorphism

Identifiers

PMID25729328
PMCPMC4344773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.