Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25729303›Full record

ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2015

Acute effects of whole-body vibration on trunk and neck muscle activity in consideration of different vibration loads.

Dennis Perchthaler, Simon Hauser, Hans-Christian Heitkamp, Tobias Hein, Stefan Grau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on Lumbar-Abdominal Muscles Activation in Healthy Young Adults: A Pilot Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dennis PerchthalerDepartment of Sports Medicine, Medical Clinic, University of Tuebingen , Germany.
Simon HauserDepartment of Sports Medicine, Medical Clinic, University of Tuebingen , Germany.
Hans-Christian HeitkampDepartment of Sports Medicine, Medical Clinic, University of Tuebingen , Germany.
Tobias HeinDepartment of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, Biomechanics, University of Gothenburg , Sweden.
Stefan GrauDepartment of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, Biomechanics, University of Gothenburg , Sweden.
University of Tübingen · DEBiomechanics Institute of Valencia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intention of this study was to systematically analyze the impact of biomechanical parameters in terms of different peak-to-peak displacements and knee angles on trunk and neck muscle activity during whole-body vibration (WBV). 28 healthy men and women (age 23 ± 3 years) performed four static squat positions (2 peak-to-peak displacements x 2 knee angles) on a side alternating vibration platform with and without vibration stimulus. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to record the neuromuscular activity of the erector spinae muscle, the rectus abdominis muscle, and of the splenius muscle. EMG levels normalized to maximal voluntary contractions ranged between 3.2 - 27.2 % MVC during WBV. The increase in muscle activity caused by WBV was significant, particularly for the back muscles, which was up to 19.0 % MVC. The impact of the factor 'condition' (F-values ranged from 13.4 to 132.0, p ≤ 0.001) and of the factor 'peak-to-peak displacement' (F-values ranged from 6.4 to 69.0 and p-values from < 0.001 to 0.01) were statistically significant for each muscle tested. However, the factor 'knee angle' only affected the back muscles (F-value 10.3 and 7.3, p ≤ 0.01). The results of this study should give more information for developing effective and safe training protocols for WBV treatment of the upper body. Key pointsThe maximum levels of muscle activity were significantly reached at high amplitudes at a vibration frequency of 30 Hz.WBV leads to a higher muscle activation of the lower back muscles than of the abdominal muscles.Both knee angles of 30° and 45° have similar effects on the vibration load and represent safe positions to prevent any actual harm.Certain combinations of the biomechanical variables have similar effects on the level of muscle activity.

Indexed as

electromyographyparaspinal musclestorsoVibration

Identifiers

PMID25729303
PMCPMC4306767
OpenAlexW2387715415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.