Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25729289›Full record

ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2015

Prior Knowledge of Trial Number Influences the Incidence of Plateau at VO2max.

Dan Gordon, Oliver Caddy, Viviane Merzbach, Marie Gernigon, James Baker, Adrian Scruton, Don Keiller, Richard Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Progress Update and Challenges onFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Review
  4. Test-retest variability of VOScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dan GordonSport and Exercise Sciences Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University , UK.
Oliver CaddySport and Exercise Sciences Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University , UK.
Viviane MerzbachSport and Exercise Sciences Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University , UK.
Marie GernigonLaboratory for Vascular Investigations, University Hospital , Angers, France.
James BakerSport and Exercise Sciences Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University , UK.
Adrian ScrutonSport and Exercise Sciences Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University , UK.
Don KeillerSport and Exercise Sciences Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University , UK.
Richard BarnesDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe purpose of this study was to assess the VO2max plateau response at VO2max during a series of pre-determined trials.

methodsTen male well-trained athletes (age, 23.0 ± 3.2; height, 183.3 ± 5.5 cm; mass 77.5 ± 11.1 Kg; VO2max 66.5 ± 5.0 ml(.)kg(-1,)min(-1)), but who were VO2max testing naïve and with prior-knowledge of trial number completed four incremental tests to volitional exhaustion, separated by ~72-h for the determination of VO2max and gas exchange threshold. Throughout all trials VO2max was recorded on a breath-by-breath basis using a pre-calibrated metabolic cart, using a plateau criterion of Δ VO2 ≤1.5 ml(.)kg(-1.)min(-1) over the final 2 consecutive 30 s sampling periods. A significant difference was observed between trial-1 and trial-4 for plateau incidence (p = 0.0285) rising from 20% in trial-1 to a 70% response rate in trial-4. Furthermore a significant difference was observed for VO2dif (difference between criterion value and Δ VO2) in trial-1, 1.02 ± 1.69 ml(.)kg(-1.)min(-1) (p = 0.038), with non-significant differences observed for all other trials, despite a non-significant difference for VO2max across all trials (p > 0.05). Finally, a significant difference was observed for effort perception (RPE) at volitional exhaustion between trial-1 (17.7 ± 1.3) and trial-4 (19.0 ± 1.4) (p = 0.0052). These data indicate that prior-knowledge of trial number can influence the manifestation of the VO2 plateau in a group of well-trained male athletes, thereby suggesting that a form of effort control is established in order to preserve the finite anaerobic capacity. Key pointsIn well-trained athletes the incidence of plateau at VO2max increases in conjunction with an increase in trial number and the associated sensations of pain and fatigue.By informing the participant of the number of trials to be completed a closed-loop condition is developed whereby effort in all trials is compared to a perceptually developed template.Closed-loop condition leads to a sparing of the finite anaerobic capacity during incremental tests when the number of trials to be completed is known.

Indexed as

anaerobic capacityeffort controlexperienceMaximal oxygen uptake

Identifiers

PMID25729289
PMCPMC4306782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.