Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25729104›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Adding industry and occupation questions to the behavioral risk factor surveillance system: new opportunities in public health surveillance.

Meredith Towle, Rickey Tolliver, Alison Grace Bui, Amy Warner, Mike Van Dyke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current Marijuana Use by Industry and Occupation - Colorado, 2014-2015.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meredith TowleColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Environmental Epidemiology, Occupational Health and Toxicology Branch, Denver, CO.
Rickey TolliverColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Environmental Epidemiology, Occupational Health and Toxicology Branch, Denver, CO.
Alison Grace BuiColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Environmental Epidemiology, Occupational Health and Toxicology Branch, Denver, CO.
Amy WarnerColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Environmental Epidemiology, Occupational Health and Toxicology Branch, Denver, CO.
Mike Van DykeColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Environmental Epidemiology, Occupational Health and Toxicology Branch, Denver, CO.

Funding

Occupational Health Surveillance in ColoradoU60OH009842 · OH · COLORADO STATE DEPT/PUB HLTH & ENVIRONMT · PI VAN DYKE, MICHAEL V · 2010 to 2014
$571k
NIOSH CDC HHS 5U60OH00 9842-05NIOSH CDC HHS U60 OH009842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIndustry and occupation variables are overlooked in many public health surveillance efforts, yet they are useful for describing the burden and distribution of various public health diseases, behaviors, and conditions. This study is the first ever analysis of the Colorado Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to describe chronic conditions and risk behaviors by occupation. It is intended to provide a new perspective on this existing data source and demonstrate the value of occupation as a core demographic variable for public health research, policy, and practice.

methodsTwo standardized employment questions were included in the 2012 Colorado BRFSS survey and administered to eligible survey respondents who were employed, self-employed, or out of work for less than one year. Occupation data were coded using the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Industry and Occupation Computerized Coding System. We analyzed health behaviors and conditions by major occupation groups. We calculated prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsThe prevalence of chronic conditions, health statuses, and risk behaviors (e.g., smoking and seatbelt use) varied significantly by occupation. For example, compared with all workers (93.6%, 95% CI 92.7, 94.5), significantly fewer workers in farming, forestry, fishing and construction, extraction jobs (87.0%, 95% CI 82.0, 92.0) reported always or nearly always wearing a seatbelt while driving. Additionally, significantly more office and administrative support workers (27.5%, 95% CI 22.5, 32.4) compared with all workers (20.6%, 95% CI 19.3, 22.0) were obese. Further observation and research is needed to understand the effects of occupation on health outcomes and behaviors.

conclusionThere are no other Colorado state-level datasets that link health behaviors and chronic conditions with occupation. This study shows that the prevalence of chronic conditions and risk behaviors varies substantially by occupation. Other states conducting the BRFSS may choose to adopt the NIOSH industry and occupation module and add other questions to further investigate health issues by occupation.

Indexed as

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemHealth StatusPublic Health SurveillanceAdultChronic DiseaseColoradoDatasets as TopicHumansIndustryMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityOccupationsRisk-Taking

Identifiers

PMID25729104
PMCPMC4315856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.