Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25728991›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2015

Targeting cancer-specific mutations by T cell receptor gene therapy.

Thomas Blankenstein, Matthias Leisegang, Wolfgang Uckert, Hans Schreiber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06499025 (A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Initial Efficacy of Targeted AML1-ETO Neoantigen Cytotoxic T Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06499025 early_phase1enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Initial Efficacy of Targeted AML1-ETO Neoantigen Cytotoxic T Cells (CTL) in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory t(8; 21) AML

TypeinterventionalSponsorBGI, ChinaRan2024 to 2027Enrolled16ConditionsAML, t(8, 21), NeoantigenArmstargeted AML1-ETO neoantigen cytotoxic T cells (CTL), Cyclophosphamide injection, Decitabine Injection, Liposome mitoxantrone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. CD8Nature reviews. Immunology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Neo-Splicetopes in Tumor Therapy: A Lost Case?Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas BlankensteinMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, 13092 Berlin, Germany; Institute of Immunology, Charité Campus Buch, 13125 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: tblanke@mdc-berlin.de.
Matthias LeisegangInstitute of Immunology, Charité Campus Buch, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang UckertMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, 13092 Berlin, Germany; Institute of Biology, Humboldt University Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Hans SchreiberInstitute of Immunology, Charité Campus Buch, 13125 Berlin, Germany; Department of Pathology, Committee on Immunology and Committee on Cancer Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

Protein Expression and Peptide CoreP01CA097296 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SCHREIBER, HANS · 2003 to 2012
$15.0M
PATHOBIOLOGY OF MYELOMA AND ANTI-IDIOTYPIC IMMUNITYR01CA022677 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SCHREIBER, HANS · 1985 to 2024
$6.3M
IMMUNOLOGY OF UNIQUE TUMOR-SPECIFIC ANTIGENSR01CA037156 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SCHREIBER, HANS · 1985 to 2017
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA097296NCI NIH HHS P01-CA97296NCI NIH HHS R01 CA022677NCI NIH HHS R01 CA037156NCI NIH HHS R01-CA22677NCI NIH HHS R01-CA37156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ease of sequencing the cancer genome, identifying all somatic mutations and grafting mutation-specific T cell receptor (TCR) genes into T cells for adoptive transfer allow, for the first time, a truly tumor-specific and effective therapy. Mutation-specific TCR gene therapy might achieve optimal efficacy with least possible toxicity. Recent clinical data confirm the long-standing evidence from experimental cancer models that antigens encoded by the tumor-specific somatic mutations are potentially the best targets for adoptive T cell therapy. Open questions are, how many somatic mutations create suitable epitopes, whether only individual-specific or also recurrent somatic mutations qualify as suitable epitopes and how neoantigen-specific TCRs are most efficiently obtained. Tumor heterogeneity needs to be considered; therefore, it will be important to identify immunogenic driver mutations that occurred early, are essential for cancer cell survival and present in all cancer cells.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveMutationAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansNeoplasmsProtein BindingReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRecombinant Fusion ProteinsT-Cell Antigen Receptor SpecificityT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTreatment OutcomeAntigens, NeoplasmEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25728991
PMCPMC4557613
OpenAlexW2093827043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.