ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2015
Erectile dysfunction as a marker for cardiovascular disease diagnosis and intervention: a cost analysis.
Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Erectile dysfunction and risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the general population: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.World journal of urology · 2018Pooled it
- The Association of Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Critical Review.American journal of men's health · 2017Pooled it
- Chronic periodontitis and the risk of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2017Pooled it
- The association between the red cell distribution width to serum albumin ratio and erectile dysfunction in American adults: A cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey analysis from 2001 to 2004.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- The association between lipid parameters and erectile dysfunction: a two-sample Mendelian randomization and case-control study.Endocrine · 2024Article
- The association between urinary organophosphate insecticide metabolites and erectile dysfunction in the United States.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Does erectile dysfunction predict cardiovascular risk? A cross-sectional study of clinical characteristics in patients with erectile dysfunction combined with coronary heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of moderate to severe erectile dysfunction among adult men in Malaysia.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Are sex disparities in COVID-19 a predictable outcome of failing men's health provision?Nature reviews. Urology · 2022Review
- Increasing access to erectile dysfunction treatment via pharmacies to improve healthcare provider visits and quality of life: Results from a prospective real-world observational study in the United Kingdom.International journal of clinical practice · 2021Observational
- Survival of Patients on Hemodialysis with Erectile Dysfunction.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
- Serum adropin as a predictive biomarker of erectile dysfunction in coronary artery disease patients.Central European journal of urology · 2019Article
- Precision Medicine and Men's Health.American journal of men's health · 2017Review
- Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction in Mainland China: Evidence Based on Epidemiological Surveys.Sexual medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionErectile dysfunction (ED) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examine the costs of screening men with ED for CVD risk factors and the cost savings of treating these at risk men.
aimThis study aims to evaluate the effect of screening men presenting with ED for CVD risk factors and to determine the cost effectiveness of this screening protocol.
methodsThe known incidence and prevalence of ED and CVD, the rate of undiagnosed CVD, and the effects of CVD treatment were used to model the change in prevalence of acute CVD events and ED as a function of the number of men with ED and CVD. The cost savings associated with reduction in acute cardiovascular (CV) events and ED prevalence was estimated over 20 years.
main outcome measuresAcute CVD event rate reduction and associated cost savings were modeled over 20 years.
resultsThe relative risk of ED in men with CVD is 1.47 and the coprevalence of both ED and CVD was estimated at 1,991,520 men. Approximately 44% of men with CVD risk factors are unaware of their risk. If all men presenting with ED were screened for CVD, 5.8 million men with previously unknown CVD risk factors would be identified over 20 years, costing $2.7 billion to screen. Assuming a 20% decrease in CV events as a result of screening and treatment, 1.1 million cardiovascular events would be avoided, saving $21.3 billion over 20 years. Similarly, 1.1 million cases of ED would be treated, saving $9.7 billion. Together, the reduction in acute CVD and ED treatment cost would save $28.5 billion over 20 years.
conclusionsScreening for CVD in men presenting with ED can be a cost-effective intervention for secondary prevention of both CVD and, over the longer term, ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.