Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25728904›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2015

Erectile dysfunction as a marker for cardiovascular disease diagnosis and intervention: a cost analysis.

Alexander W Pastuszak, Daniel A Hyman, Naveen Yadav, Guilherme Godoy, Larry I Lipshultz, Andre B Araujo, Mohit Khera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Precision Medicine and Men's Health.American journal of men's health · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander W PastuszakCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Daniel A Hyman
Naveen Yadav
Guilherme Godoy
Larry I Lipshultz
Andre B Araujo
Mohit Khera

Funding

K-12: Male Reproductive Health Research (MRHR) Career Development Program at BCMK12HD073917 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LAMB, DOLORES JEAN · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR TARGETED TREATMENT OF NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCERK23CA160664 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GODOY, GUILHERME · 2013 to 2016
$541k
NCI NIH HHS K23 CA160664NCI NIH HHS K23CA160664NICHD NIH HHS HD073917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionErectile dysfunction (ED) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examine the costs of screening men with ED for CVD risk factors and the cost savings of treating these at risk men.

aimThis study aims to evaluate the effect of screening men presenting with ED for CVD risk factors and to determine the cost effectiveness of this screening protocol.

methodsThe known incidence and prevalence of ED and CVD, the rate of undiagnosed CVD, and the effects of CVD treatment were used to model the change in prevalence of acute CVD events and ED as a function of the number of men with ED and CVD. The cost savings associated with reduction in acute cardiovascular (CV) events and ED prevalence was estimated over 20 years.

main outcome measuresAcute CVD event rate reduction and associated cost savings were modeled over 20 years.

resultsThe relative risk of ED in men with CVD is 1.47 and the coprevalence of both ED and CVD was estimated at 1,991,520 men. Approximately 44% of men with CVD risk factors are unaware of their risk. If all men presenting with ED were screened for CVD, 5.8 million men with previously unknown CVD risk factors would be identified over 20 years, costing $2.7 billion to screen. Assuming a 20% decrease in CV events as a result of screening and treatment, 1.1 million cardiovascular events would be avoided, saving $21.3 billion over 20 years. Similarly, 1.1 million cases of ED would be treated, saving $9.7 billion. Together, the reduction in acute CVD and ED treatment cost would save $28.5 billion over 20 years.

conclusionsScreening for CVD in men presenting with ED can be a cost-effective intervention for secondary prevention of both CVD and, over the longer term, ED.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesCost-Benefit AnalysisErectile DysfunctionGlycated HemoglobinHumansIncidenceLipidsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsBiomarkersGlycated HemoglobinLipidsCardiovascular DiseaseCardiovascular Disease TreatmentCardiovascular Risk FactorsCost AnalysisErectile DysfunctionErectile Dysfunction Treatment

Identifiers

PMID25728904
PMCPMC4390459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.