Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25728758›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2015

Detection of influenza A and B with the Alere ™ i Influenza A & B: a novel isothermal nucleic acid amplification assay.

Briony Hazelton, Timothy Gray, Jennifer Ho, V Mala Ratnamohan, Dominic E Dwyer, Jen Kok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances in the Rapid Diagnostic of Viral Respiratory Tract Infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Improved performances of the second generation of the ID NOW influenza A&B 2® and comparison with the GeneXpert®.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparison of Cepheid Xpert Xpress and Abbott ID Now to Roche cobas for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cost-Effective Respiratory Virus Testing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Briony HazeltonCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, Institute for Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Timothy Gray
Jennifer Ho
V Mala Ratnamohan
Dominic E Dwyer
Jen Kok

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) have an important role in clinical decision-making; however, the performances of currently available assays vary widely.

objectivesWe evaluated the performance of the Alere(™) i Influenza A&B (Alere(™) iNAT), a rapid isothermal nucleic acid amplification assay that has recently received FDA clearance, for the detection of influenza A and B viruses during the Australian influenza season of 2013. Results were compared to two other RIDTs tested in parallel; Quidel Sofia(®) Influenza A+B fluorescent immunoassay (FIA) and Alere(™) BinaxNOW(®) Influenza A & B immunochromatographic (ICT) assay.

methodsA total of 202 paired nasopharyngeal swabs collected from patients ≥ 16 years old with an influenza-like illness (ILI) were eluted in 2 ml of universal transport medium (UTM) that was used to perform all three RIDTs in parallel. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used as the reference standard.

resultsCompared to RT-PCR, Alere(™) iNAT detected 77.8% influenza A positive samples versus 71.4% and 44.4% for the Quidel Sofia(®) Influenza A+B FIA and BinaxNOW(®) Influenza A & B ICT assay, respectively. For influenza B, Alere(™) iNAT detected 75% of those positive by RT-PCR, versus 33.3% and 25.0% for Sofia(®) and BinaxNOW(®), respectively. The specificity of Alere(™) iNAT was 100% for influenza A and 99% for influenza B.

conclusionsAlere(™) i Influenza A&B is a promising new rapid influenza diagnostic assay with potential point-of-care applications.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesAdultAustraliaChromatography, AffinityFemaleHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care SystemsReference StandardsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSeasonsInfluenzaisothermal nucleic acid amplificationrapid diagnostic test(s)sensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID25728758
PMCPMC4415699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.