Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25728682›Full record

ArticleOncogene2015

SETD2 loss-of-function promotes renal cancer branched evolution through replication stress and impaired DNA repair.

N Kanu, E Grönroos, P Martinez, R A Burrell, X Yi Goh, J Bartkova, A Maya-Mendoza, M Mistrík, A J Rowan, H Patel and 19 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

N KanuUCL Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, London, UK.
E GrönroosCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
P MartinezCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
R A BurrellCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
X Yi GohCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
J BartkovaDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
A Maya-MendozaDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
M MistríkFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
A J RowanCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
H PatelCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
A RabinowitzCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
P EastCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
G WilsonCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
C R SantosCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
N McGranahanCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
S GulatiCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
M GerlingerCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
N J BirkbakUCL Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, London, UK.
T JoshiDepartment of Systems Biology, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0939-2982
L B AlexandrovCancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridgeshire, UK.
M R StrattonCancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridgeshire, UK.
T PowlesBarts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
N MatthewsCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
P A BatesCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
A StewartCancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK.
Z SzallasiDepartment of Systems Biology, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
J LarkinDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
J BartekDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
C SwantonUCL Cancer Institute, Paul O'Gorman Building, London, UK.
Cancer Research UK · GBDanish Cancer Society · DKInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine · CZWellcome Sanger Institute · GBBoston Children's Hospital · USCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10748Cancer Research UK 17786Cancer Research UK 18377Cancer Research UK 19310European Research Council 617844Medical Research Council G0701935Medical Research Council G0701935/2Medical Research Council G0902275Wellcome Trust 105104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defining mechanisms that generate intratumour heterogeneity and branched evolution may inspire novel therapeutic approaches to limit tumour diversity and adaptation. SETD2 (Su(var), Enhancer of zeste, Trithorax-domain containing 2) trimethylates histone-3 lysine-36 (H3K36me3) at sites of active transcription and is mutated in diverse tumour types, including clear cell renal carcinomas (ccRCCs). Distinct SETD2 mutations have been identified in spatially separated regions in ccRCC, indicative of intratumour heterogeneity. In this study, we have addressed the consequences of SETD2 loss-of-function through an integrated bioinformatics and functional genomics approach. We find that bi-allelic SETD2 aberrations are not associated with microsatellite instability in ccRCC. SETD2 depletion in ccRCC cells revealed aberrant and reduced nucleosome compaction and chromatin association of the key replication proteins minichromosome maintenance complex component (MCM7) and DNA polymerase δ hindering replication fork progression, and failure to load lens epithelium-derived growth factor and the Rad51 homologous recombination repair factor at DNA breaks. Consistent with these data, we observe chromosomal breakpoint locations are biased away from H3K36me3 sites in SETD2 wild-type ccRCCs relative to tumours with bi-allelic SETD2 aberrations and that H3K36me3-negative ccRCCs display elevated DNA damage in vivo. These data suggest a role for SETD2 in maintaining genome integrity through nucleosome stabilization, suppression of replication stress and the coordination of DNA repair.

Indexed as

MutationCarcinoma, Renal CellCell Line, TumorDNA RepairDNA ReplicationGenetic HeterogeneityHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistonesHumansKidney NeoplasmsMicrosatellite InstabilityNucleosomesHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistonesNucleosomesSETD2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25728682
PMCPMC4660036
OpenAlexW2016123658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.