Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25728177›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2015

Auditory and visual cortex of primates: a comparison of two sensory systems.

Josef P Rauschecker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuronal Representation of Auditory Distance Percepts vs. Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The impact of crossmodal predictions on the neural processing of aesthetic stimuli.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Anatomy of the auditory cortex then and now.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. A bio-inspired geometric model for sound reconstruction.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An Oscillator Ensemble Model of Sequence Learning.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Where, When, and How: Are they all sensorimotor? Towards a unified view of the dorsal pathway in vision and audition.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Josef P RauscheckerDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, NRB WP19, 3970 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC, 20057-1460, USA; Institute for Advanced Study, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.

Funding

Sensory cortical organization and cross-modal plasticity in blind subjectsR01EY018923 · NEI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAUSCHECKER, JOSEF P · 2009 to 2016
$2.4M
Visual and Auditory Processing Streams in the Cerebral CortexR01NS052494 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAUSCHECKER, JOSEF P · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION--NONPRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEXR01DC003489 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAUSCHECKER, JOSEF P · 1997 to 2004
$563k
Processing Streams in the Cerebral CortexR56NS052494 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAUSCHECKER, JOSEF P · 2013 to 2013
$511k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018923NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003489NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC03489NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052494NINDS NIH HHS R01NS052494NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS052494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative view of the brain, comparing related functions across species and sensory systems, offers a number of advantages. In particular, it allows separation of the formal purpose of a model structure from its implementation in specific brains. Models of auditory cortical processing can be conceived by analogy to the visual cortex, incorporating neural mechanisms that are found in both the visual and auditory systems. Examples of such canonical features at the columnar level are direction selectivity, size/bandwidth selectivity, and receptive fields with segregated vs. overlapping ON and OFF subregions. On a larger scale, parallel processing pathways have been envisioned that represent the two main facets of sensory perception: (i) identification of objects; and (ii) processing of space. Expanding this model in terms of sensorimotor integration and control offers an overarching view of cortical function independently of sensory modality.

Indexed as

ConnectomeAnimalsAuditory CortexHumansPrimatesVisual Cortexhierarchical processinginternal modelssensorimotor integrationsimple and complex cellsventral and dorsal streams

Identifiers

PMID25728177
PMCPMC4347938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.