ArticleAmerican journal of infection control2015
Understanding the current state of infection prevention to prevent Clostridium difficile infection: a human factors and systems engineering approach.
Article in American journal of infection control, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Compliance with transmission-based precautions, and associated factors among healthcare providers in Cameroon: a cross-sectional study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Standard vs. enhanced implementation strategies to increase adoption of a multidrug-resistant organism alert tool: a cluster randomized trial.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- PREVENTION OF HEALTH CARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS IN U.S. HEALTH SYSTEMS: HARNESSING THE GUT MICROBIOME TO COMBAT INFECTION.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2025Review
- How are we handling protein drugs in hospitals? A human factors and systems engineering approach to compare two hospitals and suggest a best practice.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024Observational
- Moving behavioral interventions in nursing homes from planning to action: a work system evaluation of a urinary tract infection toolkit implementation.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Unfamiliar personal protective equipment: The role of routine practice and other factors affecting healthcare personnel doffing strategies.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023Article
- Eliciting Design Requirements for a Computer-Aided Monitoring and Alerting System to Improve PPE Compliance among Healthcare Workers.DIS. Designing Interactive Systems (Conference) · 2023Article
- Comparing infection control and ward nurses' views of the omission of infection control activities using the Missed Nursing Care Infection Prevention and Control (MNCIPC) Survey.Journal of nursing management · 2021Article
- Work systems analysis of sterile processing: assembly.BMJ quality & safety · 2021Article
- Prevention ofMicroorganisms · 2020Review
- Work systems analysis of sterile processing: decontamination.BMJ quality & safety · 2020Article
- A Work Systems Analysis of Sterile Processing: Sterilization and Case Cart Preparation.Advances in health care management · 2019Article
- Challenges And Opportunities For Improving Patient Safety Through Human Factors And Systems Engineering.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2018Article
- Identification and Characterization of Failures in Infectious Agent Transmission Precaution Practices in Hospitals: A Qualitative Study.JAMA internal medicine · 2018Article
- Screening for Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile Among Bone Marrow Transplant Patients: A Mixed-Methods Study of Intervention Effectiveness and Feasibility.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2018Article
- Article
- Infection control at an urban hospital in Manila, Philippines: a systems engineering assessment of barriers and facilitators.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2017Article
- Barriers and facilitators to infection control at a hospital in northern India: a qualitative study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2017Article
- Learning from the patient: Human factors engineering in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.American journal of infection control · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAchieving and sustaining high levels of health care worker (HCW) compliance with contact isolation precautions is challenging. The aim of this study was to determine HCW work system barriers to and facilitators of adherence to contact isolation for patients with suspected or confirmed Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) using a human factors and systems engineering approach.
methodsThis prospective cohort study took place between September 2013 and November 2013 at a large academic medical center (hospital A) and an affiliated Veterans Administration hospital (hospital B). A human factors engineering (HFE) model for patient safety, the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, was used to guide work system analysis and direct observation data collection. There were 288 observations conducted. HCWs and visitors were assessed for compliance with all components of contact isolation precautions (hand hygiene, gowning, and gloving) before and after patient contact. Time required to complete contact isolation precautions was measured, and adequacy of contact isolation supplies was assessed.
resultsFull compliance with contact isolation precautions was low at both hospitals A (7%) and B (22%). Lack of appropriate hand hygiene prior to room entry (compliance for hospital A: 18%; compliance for hospital B: 29%) was the most common reason for lack of full compliance. More time was required for full compliance compared with compliance with no components of contact isolation precautions before patient room entry, inside patient room, and after patient room exit (59.9 vs 3.2 seconds, P < .001; 507.3 vs 149.7 seconds, P = .006; 15.2 vs 1.3 seconds, P < .001, respectively). Compliance was lower when contact isolation supplies were inadequate (4% vs 16%, P = .005).
conclusionsAdherence to contact isolation precautions for CDI is a complex, time-consuming process. HFE analysis indicates that multiple work system components serve as barriers and facilitators to full compliance with contact isolation precautions and should be addressed further to prevent CDI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.