Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25727300›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2015

Substance use in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis.

L Buchy, K S Cadenhead, T D Cannon, B A Cornblatt, T H McGlashan, D O Perkins, L J Seidman, M T Tsuang, E F Walker, S W Woods and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

L BuchyDepartment of Psychiatry,University of Calgary,Calgary,Alberta,Canada.
K S CadenheadDepartment of Psychiatry,UCSD,San Diego,CA,USA.
T D CannonDepartment of Psychology,Yale University,New Haven,CT,USA.
B A CornblattDepartment of Psychiatry,Zucker Hillside Hospital,Long Island,NY,USA.
T H McGlashanDepartment of Psychiatry,Yale University,New Haven,CT,USA.
D O PerkinsDepartment of Psychiatry,University of North Carolina,Chapel Hill,NC,USA.
L J SeidmanDepartment of Psychiatry,Harvard Medical School at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Massachusetts General Hospital,Boston,MA,USA.
M T TsuangDepartment of Psychology,Yale University,New Haven,CT,USA.
E F WalkerDepartments of Psychology and Psychiatry,Emory University,Atlanta,GA,USA.
S W WoodsDepartment of Psychiatry,Yale University,New Haven,CT,USA.
R HeinssenSchizophrenia Spectrum Research Program, Division of Adult Translational Research,National Institute of Mental Health,Bethesda,MD,USA.
C E BeardenDepartments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and Psychology,UCLA,Los Angeles,CA,USA.
D MathalonDepartments of Psychiatry,University of California,San Francisco,San Francisco,CA,USA.
J AddingtonDepartment of Psychiatry,University of Calgary,Calgary,Alberta,Canada.

Funding

STRESS AND EMOTIONAL REACTIVITYP50MH066286 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NUECHTERLEIN, KEITH H · 2003 to 2014
$18.6M
1/9 Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081902 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANNON, TYRONE D · 2008 to 2018
$12.4M
Vulnerability to Progression SchizophreniaP50MH080272 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WOO, TSUNGUNG · 2007 to 2011
$9.9M
5/9 Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH082004 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PERKINS, DIANA O. · 2008 to 2018
$7.5M
Administrative Supplement Harmonization of At Risk Multisite Observational Networks for Youth(HARMONY)U01MH081928 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI STONE, WILLIAM SETH · 2008 to 2018
$7.1M
4/9-Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081857 · NIMH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI CORNBLATT, BARBARA A. · 2008 to 2018
$6.2M
8/9 Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH082022 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WOODS, SCOTT W · 2008 to 2018
$6.0M
2/9 - Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081988 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WALKER, ELAINE FRAN · 2008 to 2018
$5.4M
"7/9" Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081984 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY · PI ADDINGTON, JEAN M · 2008 to 2018
$4.2M
VULNERABILITY MARKERS IN PRODROMAL SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH060720 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CADENHEAD, KRISTIN S. · 2000 to 2010
$4.0M
Vulnerability Markers in the Prodrome and First Episode of SchizophreniaK24MH076191 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CADENHEAD, KRISTIN S. · 2007 to 2011
$679k
NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH076191NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH76191NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH066286NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH080272NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060720NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH60720NIMH NIH HHS U01MH08022NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081857NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081902NIMH NIH HHS U01MH081902NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081928NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081984NIMH NIH HHS U01MH081984NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081988NIMH NIH HHS U01MH081988NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH082004NIMH NIH HHS U01MH082004NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH082022NIMH NIH HHS UO1 MH081857-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA series of research reports has indicated that the use of substances such as cannabis, alcohol and tobacco are higher in youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of developing psychosis than in controls. Little is known about the longitudinal trajectory of substance use, and findings on the relationship between substance use and later transition to psychosis in CHR individuals are mixed.

methodAt baseline and 6- and 12-month follow-ups, 735 CHR and 278 control participants completed the Alcohol and Drug Use Scale and a cannabis use questionnaire. The longitudinal trajectory of substance use was evaluated with linear mixed models.

resultsCHR participants endorsed significantly higher cannabis and tobacco use severity, and lower alcohol use severity, at baseline and over a 1-year period compared with controls. CHR youth had higher lifetime prevalence and frequency of cannabis, and were significantly younger upon first use, and were more likely to use alone and during the day. Baseline substance use did not differentiate participants who later transitioned to psychosis (n = 90) from those who did not transition (n = 272). Controls had lower tobacco use than CHR participants with a prodromal progression clinical outcome and lower cannabis use than those with a psychotic clinical outcome at the 2-year assessment.

conclusionsIn CHR individuals cannabis and tobacco use is higher than in controls and this pattern persists across 1 year. Evaluation of clinical outcome may provide additional information on the longitudinal impact of substance use that cannot be detected through evaluation of transition/non-transition to psychosis alone.

Indexed as

Prodromal SymptomsAdolescentAdultCannabisCase-Control StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSubstance-Related DisordersAlcoholcannabisprodromesubstance usetobacco

Identifiers

PMID25727300
PMCPMC8182984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.