Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25727199›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in mouse biology2015

Mouse models of bone healing: fracture, marrow ablation, and distraction osteogenesis.

Kyle Lybrand, Beth Bragdon, Louis Gerstenfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in mouse biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Activation of canonical Wnt signaling accelerates intramembranous bone regeneration in male mice.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyle LybrandOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Beth BragdonOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Louis GerstenfeldOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

A Systems Genetics Approach to Fracture HealingR01AR059741 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI GERSTENFELD, LOUIS CHARLES · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Role of Angiogenesis in Distraction OsteogenesisR01AR056637 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI GERSTENFELD, LOUIS CHARLES · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056637NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR056637NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059741NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR059741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three commonly used murine surgical models of bone healing [closed fracture with intramedullary fixation, distraction osteogenesis (DO), and marrow ablation by reaming] are presented. Detailed surgical protocols for each model are outlined. The nature of the regenerative processes and the types of research questions that may be addressed with these models are briefly outlined. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these models are compared to a number of other surgical models that are used to address similar research questions.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryOsteogenesis, DistractionAnimalsBone MarrowFractures, BoneFractures, ClosedHumansMiceModels, Animaldistraction osteogenesisfracturemurine modelsorthopedic surgeryreaming

Identifiers

PMID25727199
PMCPMC4380295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.