Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25727067›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2015

Novel bayes factors that capture expert uncertainty in prior density specification in genetic association studies.

Amy V Spencer, Angela Cox, Wei-Yu Lin, Douglas F Easton, Kyriaki Michailidou, Kevin Walters

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fine-mapping genetic associations.Human molecular genetics · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amy V SpencerSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Angela Cox
Wei-Yu Lin
Douglas F Easton
Kyriaki Michailidou
Kevin Walters
University of Sheffield · GBCancer Research UK Cambridge Center · GBChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Epidemiologic StudiesU19CA148065 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI AHSAN, HABIBUL, BRUGGE, JOAN SIEFERT · 2010 to 2014
$10.6M
Epidemiological and Clinical Translational Studies Post Genome-Wide AssociationU19CA148537 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EASTON, DOUGLAS FREDERICK, EELES, ROSALIND · 2010 to 2014
$10.4M
Ovarian cancer GWAS discovery, expansion and replication (N2 - Project #1)U19CA148112 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SELLERS, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2014
$10.2M
A genome-wide association study for breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriersR01CA128978 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2008 to 2012
$4.8M
Cancer Research UK 16563Cancer Research UK C12292/A11174Cancer Research UK C1281/A12014Cancer Research UK C1287/A10118Cancer Research UK C1287/A10710Cancer Research UK C5047/A10692Cancer Research UK C5047/A15007Cancer Research UK C5047/A8384CIHRNCI NIH HHS 1U19 CA148065NCI NIH HHS 1U19 CA148112NCI NIH HHS 1U19 CA148537NCI NIH HHS CA128978NCI NIH HHS R01 CA128978NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148065NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148112NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayes factors (BFs) are becoming increasingly important tools in genetic association studies, partly because they provide a natural framework for including prior information. The Wakefield BF (WBF) approximation is easy to calculate and assumes a normal prior on the log odds ratio (logOR) with a mean of zero. However, the prior variance (W) must be specified. Because of the potentially high sensitivity of the WBF to the choice of W, we propose several new BF approximations with logOR ∼N(0,W), but allow W to take a probability distribution rather than a fixed value. We provide several prior distributions for W which lead to BFs that can be calculated easily in freely available software packages. These priors allow a wide range of densities for W and provide considerable flexibility. We examine some properties of the priors and BFs and show how to determine the most appropriate prior based on elicited quantiles of the prior odds ratio (OR). We show by simulation that our novel BFs have superior true-positive rates at low false-positive rates compared to those from both P-value and WBF analyses across a range of sample sizes and ORs. We give an example of utilizing our BFs to fine-map the CASP8 region using genotype data on approximately 46,000 breast cancer case and 43,000 healthy control samples from the Collaborative Oncological Gene-environment Study (COGS) Consortium, and compare the single-nucleotide polymorphism ranks to those obtained using WBFs and P-values from univariate logistic regression.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremComputer SimulationModels, GeneticBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenotypeHumansInternational AgenciesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProbabilitySample SizeUncertaintyelicitationempiricalexpert knowledgefilteringfine mappingflexibilityhyperparametersensitivitysingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID25727067
PMCPMC4406822
OpenAlexW2023223398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.