Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25726950›Full record

ArticleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2015

Trends in the use of pre-operative radiation for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the United States.

Erin E Burke, Schelomo Marmor, Pamela R Portschy, Beth A Virnig, Lawrence C Cho, Todd M Tuttle, Eric H Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment and Minimally Invasive Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatoduodenectomy: an ACS NSQIP Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erin E BurkeDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Schelomo MarmorDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Pamela R PortschyDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Beth A VirnigSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Lawrence C ChoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Todd M TuttleDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Eric H JensenDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

UAB / UMN SPORE in Pancreatic CancerP50CA101955 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BUCHSBAUM, DONALD J · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS 2P50CA101955NCI NIH HHS P50 CA101955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit and timing of radiation therapy (RT) for patients undergoing a resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains unclear. This study identifies trends in the use of radiation over a 10-year period and factors associated with the use of pre-operative radiation, in particular.

methodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry was used to identify patients aged ≥18 years with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent a surgical resection between 2000 and 2010. Logistic regression was used to identify time trends and factors associated with the use of pre-operative radiation.

resultsThe overall use of radiation decreased with time among the 8474 patients who met the inclusion criteria. However, the use of pre-operative radiation increased from 1.8% to 3.9% (P ≤ 0.05). Factors significantly associated with receipt of pre-operative radiation were younger age, treatment in more recent years and having an advanced T-stage tumour. The 5-year hazard of death was significantly less for those who received pre-operative radiation versus surgery alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.74] and for those who received post-operative radiation versus surgery alone (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.73). DISCUSSION: The use of pre-operative radiation significantly increased during the study period. However, the overall use of pre-operative radiation therapy remains low in spite of the potential benefits.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Proportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID25726950
PMCPMC4430786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.