Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25726569›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Development of data representation standards by the human proteome organization proteomics standards initiative.

Eric W Deutsch, Juan Pablo Albar, Pierre-Alain Binz, Martin Eisenacher, Andrew R Jones, Gerhard Mayer, Gilbert S Omenn, Sandra Orchard, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Henning Hermjakob

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Proteomics Standards Initiative Extended FASTA Format.Journal of proteome research · 2019
    Article
  13. Expanding the Use of Spectral Libraries in Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Golden Age for Working with Public Proteomics Data.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Eric W DeutschInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, USA eric.deutsch@systemsbiology.org.
Juan Pablo AlbarDied July 18, 2014 Proteomics Facility, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología - CSIC, Madrid, Spain ProteoRed Consortium, Spanish National Institute of Proteomics, Madrid, Spain.
Pierre-Alain BinzCHUV Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Martin EisenacherMedizinisches Proteom Center (MPC), Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Andrew R JonesInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Gerhard MayerMedizinisches Proteom Center (MPC), Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Gilbert S OmennInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, USA Department of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Sandra OrchardEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Juan Antonio VizcaínoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Henning HermjakobEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Ruhr University Bochum · DEWellcome Trust · GBCentro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBInstitute for Systems Biology · USUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Shortening the development cycle time of Trans Proteomic Pipeline tools with high performance computingR01GM087221 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI DEUTSCH, ERIC, MORITZ, ROBERT L · 2010 to 2021
$6.0M
Complete Human Peptide- and MRM-AtlasRC2HG005805 · NHGRI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI HOOD, LEROY E, MORITZ, ROBERT L · 2009 to 2010
$4.6M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K01997X/1NHGRI NIH HHS RC2 HG005805NHGRI NIH HHS RC2HG005805NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201000035CNIGMS NIH HHS 2P50GM075647NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087221NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM087221Wellcome Trust WT101477MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the goals of the Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) of the Human Proteome Organization, the methods that the PSI has employed to create data standards, the resulting output of the PSI, lessons learned from the PSI's evolution, and future directions and synergies for the group. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe PSI has 5 categories of deliverables that have guided the group. These are minimum information guidelines, data formats, controlled vocabularies, resources and software tools, and dissemination activities. These deliverables are produced via the leadership and working group organization of the initiative, driven by frequent workshops and ongoing communication within the working groups. Official standards are subjected to a rigorous document process that includes several levels of peer review prior to release.

resultsWe have produced and published minimum information guidelines describing what information should be provided when making data public, either via public repositories or other means. The PSI has produced a series of standard formats covering mass spectrometer input, mass spectrometer output, results of informatics analysis (both qualitative and quantitative analyses), reports of molecular interaction data, and gel electrophoresis analyses. We have produced controlled vocabularies that ensure that concepts are uniformly annotated in the formats and engaged in extensive software development and dissemination efforts so that the standards can efficiently be used by the community.Conclusion In its first dozen years of operation, the PSI has produced many standards that have accelerated the field of proteomics by facilitating data exchange and deposition to data repositories. We look to the future to continue developing standards for new proteomics technologies and workflows and mechanisms for integration with other omics data types. Our products facilitate the translation of genomics and proteomics findings to clinical and biological phenotypes. The PSI website can be accessed at http://www.psidev.info.

Indexed as

ProteomeDatabases as TopicGuidelines as TopicHumansMass SpectrometryProteomicsSocieties, MedicalVocabulary, ControlledProteomedata formatsdata standardsguidelinesHUPOproteomicsproteomics standards initiativestandardsstandards organization

Identifiers

PMID25726569
PMCPMC4457114
OpenAlexW2115698373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.