ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015
Development of data representation standards by the human proteome organization proteomics standards initiative.
Review in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational metabolomics at scale: from open data to insight.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2026Review
- A Portable and Reusable Database Infrastructure for Mass Spectrometry, and Its Associated Toolkit (The DIMSpec Project).Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024Article
- Is DIA proteomics data FAIR? Current data sharing practices, available bioinformatics infrastructure and recommendations for the future.Proteomics · 2023Article
- The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- A Current Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics Tools, Data Formats and Resources for Mass Spectrometry Lipidomics.Metabolites · 2022Review
- Proteomics Standards Initiative's ProForma 2.0: Unifying the Encoding of Proteoforms and Peptidoforms.Journal of proteome research · 2022Article
- The Human Salivary Proteome Wiki: A Community-Driven Research Platform.Journal of dental research · 2021Article
- Community standards for open cell migration data.GigaScience · 2020Article
- The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2020: enabling 'big data' approaches in proteomics.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Human Proteome Project Mass Spectrometry Data Interpretation Guidelines 3.0.Journal of proteome research · 2019Article
- Proteomics INTegrator (PINT): An Online Tool To Store, Query, and Visualize Large Proteomics Experiment Results.Journal of proteome research · 2019Article
- Proteomics Standards Initiative Extended FASTA Format.Journal of proteome research · 2019Article
- Expanding the Use of Spectral Libraries in Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2018Review
- Challenges and Opportunities for Biological Mass Spectrometry Core Facilities in the Developing World.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2018Article
- The proBAM and proBed standard formats: enabling a seamless integration of genomics and proteomics data.Genome biology · 2018Article
- Mapping genetic variations to three-dimensional protein structures to enhance variant interpretation: a proposed framework.Genome medicine · 2017Review
- Advances in the Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project: looking to the future.Expert review of proteomics · 2017Review
- Proteomics Standards Initiative: Fifteen Years of Progress and Future Work.Journal of proteome research · 2017Article
- The mzIdentML Data Standard Version 1.2, Supporting Advances in Proteome Informatics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2017Article
- A Golden Age for Working with Public Proteomics Data.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the goals of the Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) of the Human Proteome Organization, the methods that the PSI has employed to create data standards, the resulting output of the PSI, lessons learned from the PSI's evolution, and future directions and synergies for the group. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe PSI has 5 categories of deliverables that have guided the group. These are minimum information guidelines, data formats, controlled vocabularies, resources and software tools, and dissemination activities. These deliverables are produced via the leadership and working group organization of the initiative, driven by frequent workshops and ongoing communication within the working groups. Official standards are subjected to a rigorous document process that includes several levels of peer review prior to release.
resultsWe have produced and published minimum information guidelines describing what information should be provided when making data public, either via public repositories or other means. The PSI has produced a series of standard formats covering mass spectrometer input, mass spectrometer output, results of informatics analysis (both qualitative and quantitative analyses), reports of molecular interaction data, and gel electrophoresis analyses. We have produced controlled vocabularies that ensure that concepts are uniformly annotated in the formats and engaged in extensive software development and dissemination efforts so that the standards can efficiently be used by the community.Conclusion In its first dozen years of operation, the PSI has produced many standards that have accelerated the field of proteomics by facilitating data exchange and deposition to data repositories. We look to the future to continue developing standards for new proteomics technologies and workflows and mechanisms for integration with other omics data types. Our products facilitate the translation of genomics and proteomics findings to clinical and biological phenotypes. The PSI website can be accessed at http://www.psidev.info.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.