Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25726318›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2015

Inequity to the utilization of bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sanjit K Bhogal, Jacinta I Reddigan, Ori D Rotstein, Ashley Cohen, Dresden Glockler, Andrea C Tricco, Janet K Smylie, Stephen A Glazer, Jason Pennington, Lesley Gotlib Conn and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Racial differences after bariatric surgery: 24-month follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial for postoperative loss-of-control eating.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2024
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. The Economic Cost of Obesity: A Cost-of-Illness Study in Greece.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Disparities in Access and Quality of Obesity Care.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sanjit K BhogalDepartment of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, bhogals@smh.ca.
Jacinta I Reddigan
Ori D Rotstein
Ashley Cohen
Dresden Glockler
Andrea C Tricco
Janet K Smylie
Stephen A Glazer
Jason Pennington
Lesley Gotlib Conn
Timothy D Jackson

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review explores the sociodemographic factors associated with the utilization of bariatric surgery among eligible patients. Electronic databases were searched for population-based studies that explored the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics of patients eligible for bariatric surgery to those who actually received the procedure. Twelve retrospective cohort studies were retrieved, of which the results of 9 studies were pooled using a random effects model. Patients who received bariatric surgery were significantly more likely to be white versus non-white (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.08, 2.19), female versus male (OR 2.80; 95% CI 2.46, 3.22), and have private versus government or public insurance (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.04, 6.05). Prospective cohort studies are warranted to further determine the relative effect of these factors, adjusting for confounding factors.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleObesity, MorbidProspective StudiesSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.