Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25726088›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2015

Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A in healthy adults infected with HIV-1: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Birahim Pierre Ndiaye, Friedrich Thienemann, Martin Ota, Bernard S Landry, Makhtar Camara, Siry Dièye, Tandakha Ndiaye Dieye, Hanif Esmail, Rene Goliath, Kris Huygen and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01151189 (A Phase II, Proof of Concept, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Protective Efficacy Against TB Disease, Safety, and Immunogenicity of MVA85A/AERAS-485 in Healthy, HIV-infected Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 96 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01151189 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II, Proof of Concept, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Protective Efficacy Against TB Disease, Safety, and Immunogenicity of MVA85A/AERAS-485 in Healthy, HIV-infected Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorAerasRan2011 to 2014Enrolled650ConditionsTuberculosis, HIV InfectionsArmsMVA85A/AERAS-485, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. MVA85A vaccine to enhance BCG for preventing tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antigen-experienced airway CD8Science advances · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. HowVaccines · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. AFrontiers in tuberculosis · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Birahim Pierre NdiayeLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal.
Friedrich ThienemannClinical Infectious Diseases Research Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Martin OtaMedical Research Council Unit, Fajara, The Gambia.
Bernard S LandryAeras, Rockville, MD, USA.
Makhtar CamaraLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal.
Siry DièyeLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal.
Tandakha Ndiaye DieyeLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal.
Hanif EsmailClinical Infectious Diseases Research Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rene GoliathClinical Infectious Diseases Research Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kris HuygenImmunology Service, Scientific Institute of Public Health (WIV-ISP), Brussels, Belgium.
Vanessa JanuaryClinical Infectious Diseases Research Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ibrahima NdiayeLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal.
Tolu OniClinical Infectious Diseases Research Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Michael RaineAeras, Rockville, MD, USA.
Marta RomanoImmunology Service, Scientific Institute of Public Health (WIV-ISP), Brussels, Belgium.
Iman SattiJenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sharon SuttonAeras, Rockville, MD, USA.
Aminata ThiamCentre de Traitement Ambulatoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Fann, Dakar, Senegal.
Katalin A WilkinsonClinical Infectious Diseases Research Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; MRC National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK.
Souleymane MboupLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal.
Robert J WilkinsonClinical Infectious Diseases Research Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK.
Helen McShaneJenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: helen.mcshane@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
MVA85A 030 trial investigators
Hôpital Aristide Le Dantec · SNWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa · ZAAeras · USInstitut Scientifique de Santé Publique · BEJenner Institute · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZACentre Hospitalier National Universitaire de Fann · SNImperial College London · GBMRC Unit the Gambia · GM

Funding

Wellcome Trust 084323Wellcome Trust 088316Wellcome Trust 095780Wellcome Trust 104803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV-1 infection is associated with increased risk of tuberculosis and a safe and effective vaccine would assist control measures. We assessed the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine, modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing antigen 85A (MVA85A), in adults infected with HIV-1.

methodsWe did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of MVA85A in adults infected with HIV-1, at two clinical sites, in Cape Town, South Africa and Dakar, Senegal. Eligible participants were aged 18-50 years, had no evidence of active tuberculosis, and had baseline CD4 counts greater than 350 cells per μL if they had never received antiretroviral therapy or greater than 300 cells per μL (and with undetectable viral load before randomisation) if they were receiving antiretroviral therapy; participants with latent tuberculosis infection were eligible if they had completed at least 5 months of isoniazid preventive therapy, unless they had completed treatment for tuberculosis disease within 3 years before randomisation. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) in blocks of four by randomly generated sequence to receive two intradermal injections of either MVA85A or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by antiretroviral therapy status and study site. Participants, nurses, investigators, and laboratory staff were masked to group allocation. The second (booster) injection of MVA85A or placebo was given 6-12 months after the first vaccination. The primary study outcome was safety in all vaccinated participants (the safety analysis population). Safety was assessed throughout the trial as defined in the protocol. Secondary outcomes were immunogenicity and vaccine efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and disease, assessed in the per-protocol population. Immunogenicity was assessed in a subset of participants at day 7 and day 28 after the first and second vaccination, and M tuberculosis infection and disease were assessed at the end of the study. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01151189.

findingsBetween Aug 4, 2011, and April 24, 2013, 650 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned; 649 were included in the safety analysis (324 in the MVA85A group and 325 in the placebo group) and 645 in the per-protocol analysis (320 and 325). 513 (71%) participants had CD4 counts greater than 300 cells per μL and were receiving antiretroviral therapy; 136 (21%) had CD4 counts above 350 cells per μL and had never received antiretroviral therapy. 277 (43%) had received isoniazid prophylaxis before enrolment. Solicited adverse events were more frequent in participants who received MVA85A (288 [89%]) than in those given placebo (235 [72%]). 34 serious adverse events were reported, 17 (5%) in each group. MVA85A induced a significant increase in antigen 85A-specific T-cell response, which peaked 7 days after both vaccinations and was primarily monofunctional. The number of participants with negative QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube findings at baseline who converted to positive by the end of the study was 38 (20%) of 186 in the MVA85A group and 40 (23%) of 173 in the placebo group, for a vaccine efficacy of 11·7% (95% CI -41·3 to 44·9). In the per-protocol population, six (2%) cases of tuberculosis disease occurred in the MVA85A group and nine (3%) occurred in the placebo group, for a vaccine efficacy of 32·8% (95% CI -111·5 to 80·3).

interpretationMVA85A was well tolerated and immunogenic in adults infected with HIV-1. However, we detected no efficacy against M tuberculosis infection or disease, although the study was underpowered to detect an effect against disease. Potential reasons for the absence of detectable efficacy in this trial include insufficient induction of a vaccine-induced immune response or the wrong type of vaccine-induced immune response, or both.

fundingEuropean & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (IP.2007.32080.002), Aeras, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and Oxford-Emergent Tuberculosis Consortium.

Indexed as

HIV-1AdolescentAdultAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, CDCD4 Lymphocyte CountCoinfectionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealthy VolunteersHIV InfectionsHumansImmunity, ActiveImmunization, SecondaryImmunoglobulin GInjections, IntradermalAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, CDImmunoglobulin GMVA 85ATuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID25726088
PMCPMC4648060
OpenAlexW2133457373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.