Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25725550›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2015

Development of a biological scaffold engineered using the extracellular matrix secreted by skeletal muscle cells.

Shiloh A Hurd, Nadia M Bhatti, Addison M Walker, Ben M Kasukonis, Jeffrey C Wolchok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shiloh A HurdDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, USA.
Nadia M BhattiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, USA.
Addison M WalkerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, USA.
Ben M KasukonisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, USA.
Jeffrey C WolchokDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, USA. Electronic address: jwolchok@uark.edu.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

Engineering a Muscle Mimetic BiomaterialR15AR064481 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI WOLCHOK, JEFFREY · 2014 to 2014
$437k
NIAMS NIH HHS R15 AR064481NIAMS NIH HHS R15AR064481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of implantable biomaterials derived from decellularized tissue, including encouraging results with skeletal muscle, suggests that the extracellular matrix (ECM) derived from native tissue has promising regenerative potential. Yet, the supply of biomaterials derived from donated tissue will always be limited, which is why the in-vitro fabrication of ECM biomaterials that mimic the properties of tissue is an attractive alternative. Towards this end, our group has utilized a novel method to collect the ECM that skeletal muscle myoblasts secrete and form it into implantable scaffolds. The cell derived ECM contained several matrix constituents, including collagen and fibronectin that were also identified within skeletal muscle samples. The ECM was organized into a porous network that could be formed with the elongated and aligned architecture observed within muscle samples. The ECM material supported the attachment and in-vitro proliferation of cells, suggesting effectiveness for cell transplantation, and was well tolerated by the host when examined in-vivo. The results suggest that the ECM collection approach can be used to produce biomaterials with compositions and structures that are similar to muscle samples, and while the physical properties may not yet match muscle values, the in-vitro and in-vivo results indicate it may be a suitable first generation alternative to tissue derived biomaterials.

Indexed as

AnimalsCollagen Type IExtracellular MatrixFibronectinsMaleMuscle CellsMuscle, SkeletalRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsCollagen Type IFibronectinsCell derivedDecellularizedExtracellular matrixScaffoldSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID25725550
PMCPMC4346781
OpenAlexW2012352580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.