Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25725041›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology report2015

Development of drugs for celiac disease: review of endpoints for Phase 2 and 3 trials.

Klaus Gottlieb, Jill Dawson, Fez Hussain, Joseph A Murray

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology report, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of the celiac disease symptom diary version 2.1Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Health utilities and willingness to pay in adult patients with coeliac disease in Hungary.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Innate immunity: actuating the gears of celiac disease pathogenesis.Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
  19. What is the best histopathological classification for celiac disease? Does it matter?Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2015
    Article
  20. The Progression of Celiac Disease, Diagnostic Modalities, and Treatment Options.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Klaus GottliebImmunology and Internal Medicine - Medical Strategy & Science, Quintiles, Durham, NC, USA, Corporate Communications, Quintiles, Durham, NC, USA and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA klaus.gottlieb@quintiles.com.
Jill DawsonImmunology and Internal Medicine - Medical Strategy & Science, Quintiles, Durham, NC, USA, Corporate Communications, Quintiles, Durham, NC, USA and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Fez HussainImmunology and Internal Medicine - Medical Strategy & Science, Quintiles, Durham, NC, USA, Corporate Communications, Quintiles, Durham, NC, USA and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Joseph A MurrayImmunology and Internal Medicine - Medical Strategy & Science, Quintiles, Durham, NC, USA, Corporate Communications, Quintiles, Durham, NC, USA and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease is a lifelong disorder for which there is currently only one known, effective treatment: a gluten-free diet. New treatment approaches have recently emerged; several drugs are in Phase 2 trials and results appear promising; however, discussion around regulatory endpoints is in its infancy. We will briefly discuss the drugs that are under development and then shift our attention to potential trial endpoints, such as patient-reported outcomes, histology, serology, gene expression analysis and other tests. We will outline the differing requirements for proof-of-concept Phase 2 trials and Phase 3 registration trials, with a particular emphasis on current thinking in regulatory agencies. We conclude our paper with recommendations and a glossary of regulatory terms, to enable readers who are less familiar with regulatory language to take maximum advantage of this review.

Indexed as

celiac diseaseclinical trialsendpoints

Identifiers

PMID25725041
PMCPMC4423465
OpenAlexW2004798056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.