Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25725004›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Parameterizing time in electronic health record studies.

George Hripcsak, David J Albers, Adler Perotte

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03911687 (Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03911687 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) System

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled60,893ConditionsHospital Acquired ConditionArmsCONCERN CDS system notification
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. End-to-end extraction of temporal information from psychiatric discharge summaries.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Temporal biomedical data analytics.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Modeling asynchronous event sequences with RNNs.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2018
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. High-fidelity phenotyping: richness and freedom from bias.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

George HripcsakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA Medical Informatics Services, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA hripcsak@columbia.edu.
David J AlbersDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Adler PerotteDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.

Funding

DISCOVERING AND APPLYING KNOWLEDGE IN CLINICAL DATABASESR01LM006910 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HRIPCSAK, GEORGE M · 2000 to 2023
$10.6M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM006910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFields like nonlinear physics offer methods for analyzing time series, but many methods require that the time series be stationary-no change in properties over time.Objective Medicine is far from stationary, but the challenge may be able to be ameliorated by reparameterizing time because clinicians tend to measure patients more frequently when they are ill and are more likely to vary.

methodsWe compared time parameterizations, measuring variability of rate of change and magnitude of change, and looking for homogeneity of bins of temporal separation between pairs of time points. We studied four common laboratory tests drawn from 25 years of electronic health records on 4 million patients.

resultsWe found that sequence time-that is, simply counting the number of measurements from some start-produced more stationary time series, better explained the variation in values, and had more homogeneous bins than either traditional clock time or a recently proposed intermediate parameterization. Sequence time produced more accurate predictions in a single Gaussian process model experiment.

conclusionsOf the three parameterizations, sequence time appeared to produce the most stationary series, possibly because clinicians adjust their sampling to the acuity of the patient. Parameterizing by sequence time may be applicable to association and clustering experiments on electronic health record data. A limitation of this study is that laboratory data were derived from only one institution. Sequence time appears to be an important potential parameterization.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsTimeData MiningHumansModels, Theoreticaldata miningelectronic health recordparameterizationphenotypetimetime series

Identifiers

PMID25725004
PMCPMC6169471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.