ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015
An exploration of the properties of the CORE problem list subset and how it facilitates the implementation of SNOMED CT.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using SNOMED CT-encoded problems to improve ICD-10-CM coding-A randomized controlled experiment.International journal of medical informatics · 2019Trial
- Variation in multimorbidity estimates due to clinical coding: a cross-sectional study of 7.2 million adults in England.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Exploring Physicians' Dual Perspectives on the Transition From Free Text to Structured and Standardized Documentation Practices: Interview and Participant Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- The use of SNOMED CT, 2013-2020: a literature review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Review
- The Unified Medical Language System SPECIALIST Lexicon and Lexical Tools: Development and applications.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Evaluating lexical similarity and modeling discrepancies in the procedure hierarchy of SNOMED CT.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Assessing the practice of biomedical ontology evaluation: Gaps and opportunities.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2018Review
- The development of a nursing subset of patient problems to support interoperability.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
- Enhanced LexSynonym Acquisition for Effective UMLS Concept Mapping.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2017Article
- Preparing for the ICD-10-CM Transition: Automated Methods for Translating ICD Codes in Clinical Phenotype Definitions.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2016Article
- Determining correspondences between high-frequency MedDRA concepts and SNOMED: a case study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSystematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) is the emergent international health terminology standard for encoding clinical information in electronic health records. The CORE Problem List Subset was created to facilitate the terminology's implementation. This study evaluates the CORE Subset's coverage and examines its growth pattern as source datasets are being incorporated.
methodsCoverage of frequently used terms and the corresponding usage of the covered terms were assessed by "leave-one-out" analysis of the eight datasets constituting the current CORE Subset. The growth pattern was studied using a retrospective experiment, growing the Subset one dataset at a time and examining the relationship between the size of the starting subset and the coverage of frequently used terms in the incoming dataset. Linear regression was used to model that relationship.
resultsOn average, the CORE Subset covered 80.3% of the frequently used terms of the left-out dataset, and the covered terms accounted for 83.7% of term usage. There was a significant positive correlation between the CORE Subset's size and the coverage of the frequently used terms in an incoming dataset. This implies that the CORE Subset will grow at a progressively slower pace as it gets bigger.
conclusionThe CORE Problem List Subset is a useful resource for the implementation of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms in electronic health records. It offers good coverage of frequently used terms, which account for a high proportion of term usage. If future datasets are incorporated into the CORE Subset, it is likely that its size will remain small and manageable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.