Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25724709›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2015

Increased Risk of Esophageal Eosinophilia and Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Patients With Active Celiac Disease on Biopsy.

Elizabeth T Jensen, Swathi Eluri, Benjamin Lebwohl, Robert M Genta, Evan S Dellon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epidemiologic and Clinical Clues to the Etiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Association of eosinophilic esophagitis with autoimmune and connective tissue disorders, and the impact on treatment response.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. A Comprehensive Review of Celiac Disease/Gluten-Sensitive Enteropathies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Pathophysiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2018
    Review
  16. Environmental factors and eosinophilic esophagitis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Coeliac disease: to biopsy or not?Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth T JensenCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Swathi EluriCenter for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Benjamin LebwohlCeliac Disease Center, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Robert M GentaMiraca Research Institute, Miraca Life Sciences, Irving, Texas; Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Evan S DellonCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: edellon@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USColumbia University · USMiraCosta College · US

Funding

DIGESTIVE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007634 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
Risk Factors and Biomarkers for Diagnosis & Treatment of Eosinophilic EsophagitisK23DK090073 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DELLON, EVAN SAMUEL · 2011 to 2013
$541k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK090073NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe possible association between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and celiac disease is controversial because prior results have been contradictory. We aimed to determine the relationship between EoE and celiac disease among patients with concomitant esophageal and duodenal biopsies.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study in a U.S. national pathology database by using data from January 2009 through June 2012. Our primary case definition was defined by the presence of esophageal eosinophilia with ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field. The crude and adjusted (for age and sex) odds of esophageal eosinophilia for patients with active celiac disease were compared with those without celiac disease. Sensitivity analyses were performed by using more stringent case definitions and by estimating the associations between celiac disease and reflux esophagitis and celiac disease and Barrett's esophagus.

resultsOf 292,621 patients in the source population, 88,517 with both esophageal and duodenal biopsies were studied. Four thousand one hundred one (4.6%) met criteria for EoE, and 1203 (1.4%) met criteria for celiac disease. Odds of EoE were 26% higher in patients with celiac disease than in patients without celiac disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.60). The magnitude of association varied according to EoE case definition, but all definitions showed a weak positive association between the 2 conditions. There was no association between celiac disease and reflux esophagitis (aOR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.07) or Barrett's esophagus (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.14) and celiac disease.

conclusionsThere is a weak increase in EoE in patients with celiac disease. This association strengthened with increasingly stringent definitions of EoE and was not observed for other esophageal conditions. In patients with celiac disease, concomitant EoE should be considered in the correct clinical setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsyCeliac DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDuodenumEndoscopy, Digestive SystemEosinophilic EsophagitisEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentUnited StatesYoung AdultCeliac DiseaseEosinophilic EsophagitisEpidemiologyPathologyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID25724709
PMCPMC4509819
OpenAlexW1975850794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.