ArticleThe protein journal2015
A Single Amino Acid in the Hinge Loop Region of the FOXP Forkhead Domain is Significant for Dimerisation.
Article in The protein journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- FOXP Transcription Factors in Thyroid Cancer: From Molecular Expression to Clinical Significance.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Unravelling the therapeutic potential of forkhead box proteins in breast cancer: An update (Review).Oncology reports · 2024Review
- DNA controls the dimerization of the human FoxP1 forkhead domain.Cell reports. Physical science · 2024Article
- DNA facilitates heterodimerization between human transcription factors FoxP1 and FoxP2 by increasing their conformational flexibility.iScience · 2023Article
- A comprehensive in silico analysis of the deleterious nonsynonymous SNPs of human FOXP2 protein.PloS one · 2022Article
- Human FoxP Transcription Factors as Tractable Models of the Evolution and Functional Outcomes of Three-Dimensional Domain Swapping.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Heterozygous variants that disturb the transcriptional repressor activity of FOXP4 cause a developmental disorder with speech/language delays and multiple congenital abnormalities.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Molecular networks of FOXP family: dual biologic functions, interplay with other molecules and clinical implications in cancer progression.Molecular cancer · 2019Review
- A Phosphomimetic Study Implicates Ser557 in Regulation of FOXP2 DNA Binding.The protein journal · 2018Article
- Protein-Protein Interaction Among the FoxP Family Members and their Regulation of Two Target Genes,Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2017Article
- A Potential Structural Switch for Regulating DNA-Binding by TEAD Transcription Factors.Journal of molecular biology · 2016Article
- Confocal Spectroscopy to Study Dimerization, Oligomerization and Aggregation of Proteins: A Practical Guide.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The forkhead box (FOX) proteins are a family of transcription factors that interact with DNA via a winged helix motif that forms part of the forkhead domain. The FOXP (FOXP1-4) subfamily is unique in the family in that the forkhead domains of these proteins are able to dimerise via domain swapping. In this event, structural elements are exchanged via extension of the hinge loop region. Despite the high sequence homology among the FOXP subfamily members, the stability of their forkhead domain dimers varies, with FOXP3 forming the most stable dimer. An amino acid difference is observed in the hinge region of the FOXP subfamily where a tyrosine in all members is replaced with a phenylalanine in FOXP3. In this work, the role of phenylalanine at this position in the hinge region was investigated. This was done by creating the Y540F variant of the FOXP2 forkhead domain. The effect of the Y540F mutation on the structure, dimerisation propensity and DNA binding ability of the FOXP subfamily was investigated. The mutation altered the structure of the protein by decreasing the disorder of the backbone as measured by circular dichroism spectroscopy and by altering the local environment of the hinge region as measured by tryptophan fluorescence. The propensity of the forkhead domain to form a dimer was improved ~9.5 fold by the mutation. This was attributed to increased hydrophobicity at the dimer interface as well as altered tension in the hinge loop region. DNA binding assays indicated that the affinity for DNA was decreased by the mutation. Taken together, these findings suggest that domain swapping may modulate DNA binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.