Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25724294›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2015

High doses of onabotulinumtoxinA in post-stroke spasticity: a retrospective analysis.

Alessio Baricich, Elisa Grana, Stefano Carda, Andrea Santamato, Carlo Cisari, Marco Invernizzi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. High-dose Botulinum Toxin Therapy: Safety, Benefit, and Endurance of Efficacy.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessio BaricichPhysical and Rehabilitative Medicine - University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy, alessio.baricich@maggioreosp.novara.it.
Elisa Grana
Stefano Carda
Andrea Santamato
Carlo Cisari
Marco Invernizzi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of high doses of onabotulinumtoxinA (from 600 to 800 units) in 26 patients affected by upper and/or lower limb post-stroke spasticity. They were assessed before, 30 and 90 days after treatment. We observed a significant muscle tone reduction and a significant functional improvement (assessed with the Disability Assessment Scale). No adverse events were reported. In our retrospective analysis the treatment with high doses of onabotulinumtoxinA showed to be effective and safe.

Indexed as

ArmBotulinum Toxins, Type ADisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLegMaleMiddle AgedMuscle SpasticityNeuromuscular AgentsRetrospective StudiesStrokeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.