Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25724156›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2015

The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of oral ibrutinib in healthy participants and patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Jan de Jong, Juthamas Sukbuntherng, Donna Skee, Joe Murphy, Susan O'Brien, John C Byrd, Danelle James, Peter Hellemans, David J Loury, Juhui Jiao and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Population Pharmacokinetics of Ibrutinib in Healthy Adults.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jan de JongJanssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, 3210 Merryfield Row, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA, jdejong1@its.jnj.com.
Juthamas Sukbuntherng
Donna Skee
Joe Murphy
Susan O'Brien
John C Byrd
Danelle James
Peter Hellemans
David J Loury
Juhui Jiao
Vijay Chauhan
Erik Mannaert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess ibrutinib pharmacokinetics under fasted and fed conditions, impact of food-intake timing, and the safety and tolerability.

methodsThree studies were analyzed. Study 1 was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, four-way crossover study in 44 healthy participants. Study 2 was a randomized, repeat-dose crossover study in 16 patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib dose was 420 mg in both studies. Study 3 was an open-label, sequential study to assess the effect of a standard breakfast on ibrutinib 560 mg in eight healthy participants.

resultsAdministration of single-dose ibrutinib under fasting conditions (study 1) resulted in approximately 60 % of exposure compared with drug intake either 30 min before, 30 min after (fed), or 2 h after a high-fat meal. Similar food effect was observed (study 3) when ibrutinib was given 30 min before meal. In CLL patients (study 2), the C max and AUC under fasting conditions were 43 and 61 %, respectively, relative to fed conditions. When administered once-daily in uncontrolled food-intake conditions (≥30 min before or 2 h after), exposures were slightly (≈30 %) lower than in fed condition. When corrected for repeated dosing, pharmacokinetic parameters in healthy participants and patients were comparable. Ibrutinib was generally well tolerated in all settings studied.

conclusionsIbrutinib administered in fasted condition reduces exposure to approximately 60 % as compared with dosing in proximity to food-intake, regardless of timing/type of meal. Because repeated drug intake in fasted condition is unlikely, no food restrictions may be needed to administer ibrutinib.

Indexed as

Food-Drug InteractionsAdenineAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCross-Over StudiesFastingFemaleHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesPyrazolesAdenineibrutinibPiperidinesPyrazolesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID25724156
PMCPMC4419161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.