Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25724127›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2015

The prognostic value of positive T-wave in lead aVR in hemodialysis patients.

Andrzej Jaroszyński, Anna Jaroszyńska, Janusz Siebert, Wojciech Dąbrowski, Jarosław Niedziałek, Anna Bednarek-Skublewska, Tomasz Zapolski, Andrzej Wysokiński, Wojciech Załuska, Andrzej Książek and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of T wave amplitude in lead aVR on predicting cardiac events in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. T-wave reversal in the augmented unipolar right arm electrocardiographic lead is associated with increased risk of sudden death.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrzej JaroszyńskiDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Staszica 11, 20-081, Lublin, Poland. jaroszynskiaj@interia.pl.
Anna JaroszyńskaDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Janusz SiebertDepartment of Family Medicine, University Center for Cardiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Wojciech DąbrowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Jarosław NiedziałekDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Staszica 11, 20-081, Lublin, Poland.
Anna Bednarek-SkublewskaDepartment of Nephrology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Tomasz ZapolskiDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Andrzej WysokińskiDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Wojciech ZałuskaDepartment of Nephrology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Andrzej KsiążekDepartment of Nephrology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Todd T SchlegelNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven that cardiac disease is the leading cause of mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients, identification of patients at risk for cardiac mortality is crucial. The aim of this study was to determine if positive T-wave amplitude in lead aVR (TaVR) was predictive of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in a group of HD patients. METHODS AND

resultsAfter exclusion, 223 HD patients were prospectively followed-up for 25.43 ± 3.56 months. Patients were divided into TaVR negative (n = 186) and TaVR positive (n = 37) groups. Myocardial infarction, diabetes and beta-blocker therapy were more frequent in positive TaVR patients. Patients with upright TaVR were older, had higher left ventricular mass index, lower ejection fraction, higher calcium × phosphate product, higher troponin T level, higher prevalence of ST-T abnormalities, and increased width of QRS complex and QT interval, compared with patients with negative TaVR. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative incidences of CV mortality as well as SCD were higher in patients with positive TaVR compared with those with negative TaVR (log-rank, p < 0.001 in both cases). A multivariate analysis selected age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.71, p < 0.001], heart rate (HR 1.42, p = 0.016), and positive TaVR (HR 2.21, p = 0.001) as well as age (HR 1.88, p < 0.001), and positive TaVR (HR 1.53, p = 0.014) as independent predictors of CV mortality and SCD, respectively.

conclusionIn HD patients, positive TaVR is an independent and powerful predictor of CV mortality as well as SCD. This simple ECG parameter provides additional information beyond what is available with other known traditional risk factors and allows the identification of patients most at risk of CV events.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyRenal DialysisAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesDeath, Sudden, CardiacDiabetes MellitusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Function TestsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLong QT SyndromeMaleAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCardiovascular mortalityElectrocardiogramEnd-stage renal diseaseLead aVRSudden cardiac deathT-wave amplitude

Identifiers

PMID25724127
PMCPMC4679784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.