ArticleExperimental aging research2015
Baseline cluster membership demonstrates positive associations with first occurrence of multiple gerontologic outcomes over 10 years.
Article in Experimental aging research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classifying clinical notes with pain assessment using machine learning.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2018Article
- Time-Varying Effect Models for Examining Age-Dynamic Associations in Gerontological Research.Experimental aging researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledBACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: The potential of cluster analysis (CA) as a baseline predictor of multivariate gerontologic outcomes over a long period of time has not been previously demonstrated.
methodsRestricting candidate variables to a small group of established predictors of deleterious gerontologic outcomes, various CA methods were applied to baseline values from 754 nondisabled, community-living persons, aged 70 years or older. The best cluster solution yielded at baseline was subsequently used as a fixed explanatory variable in time-to-event models of the first occurrence of the following outcomes: any disability in four activities of daily living, any disability in four mobility measures, and death. Each outcome was recorded through a maximum of 129 months or death. Associations between baseline ordinal cluster level and first occurrence of all three outcomes were modeled over a 10-year period with proportional hazards regression and compared with the associations yielded by the analogous latent class analysis (LCA) solution.
resultsThe final cluster-defining variables were continuous measures of cognitive status and depressive symptoms, and dichotomous indicators of slow gait and exhaustion. The best solution yielded by baseline values of these variables was obtained with a K-means algorithm and cosine similarity and consisted of three clusters representing increasing levels of impairment. After adjustment for age, sex, ethnic group, and number of chronic conditions, baseline ordinal cluster level demonstrated significantly positive associations with all three outcomes over a 10-year period that were equivalent to those from the corresponding LCA solution.
conclusionThese findings suggest that baseline clusters based on previously established explanatory variables have potential to predict multivariate gerontologic outcomes over a long period of time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.