Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25723923›Full record

ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2015

Radiation damage to nucleoprotein complexes in macromolecular crystallography.

Charles Bury, Elspeth F Garman, Helen Mary Ginn, Raimond B G Ravelli, Ian Carmichael, Geoff Kneale, John E McGeehan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identifying and avoiding radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. OH cleavage from tyrosine: debunking a myth.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Objective evaluation of radiation damage in a nucleoprotein complex.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016
    Article
  7. RNA protects a nucleoprotein complex against radiation damage.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Charles BuryLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Elspeth F GarmanLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Helen Mary GinnLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Raimond B G RavelliInstitute of Nanoscopy, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Ian CarmichaelNotre Dame Radiation Laboratory, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Geoff KnealeMolecular Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Portsmouth, King Henry 1st Street, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK.
John E McGeehanMolecular Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Portsmouth, King Henry 1st Street, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Portsmouth · GBMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E000878/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant progress has been made in macromolecular crystallography over recent years in both the understanding and mitigation of X-ray induced radiation damage when collecting diffraction data from crystalline proteins. In contrast, despite the large field that is productively engaged in the study of radiation chemistry of nucleic acids, particularly of DNA, there are currently very few X-ray crystallographic studies on radiation damage mechanisms in nucleic acids. Quantitative comparison of damage to protein and DNA crystals separately is challenging, but many of the issues are circumvented by studying pre-formed biological nucleoprotein complexes where direct comparison of each component can be made under the same controlled conditions. Here a model protein-DNA complex C.Esp1396I is employed to investigate specific damage mechanisms for protein and DNA in a biologically relevant complex over a large dose range (2.07-44.63 MGy). In order to allow a quantitative analysis of radiation damage sites from a complex series of macromolecular diffraction data, a computational method has been developed that is generally applicable to the field. Typical specific damage was observed for both the protein on particular amino acids and for the DNA on, for example, the cleavage of base-sugar N1-C and sugar-phosphate C-O bonds. Strikingly the DNA component was determined to be far more resistant to specific damage than the protein for the investigated dose range. At low doses the protein was observed to be susceptible to radiation damage while the DNA was far more resistant, damage only being observed at significantly higher doses.

Indexed as

Radiation InjuriesCrystallography, X-RayDNA DamageDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansModels, MolecularNucleoproteinsProtein ConformationNucleoproteinsmacromolecular crystallographyprotein–DNA complexesradiation damagespecific damage

Identifiers

PMID25723923
PMCPMC4344358
OpenAlexW2172252597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.