Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25723744›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2015

Laparoscopic endoloop technique - A novel approach of managing iatrogenic caecal perforation and literature review.

N Merali, A Hussain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N MeraliMinimal Access Unit, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Orpington, BR6 8ND London, UK. Electronic address: nabeel.merali@nhs.net.
A HussainMinimal access unit, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Honorary Senior Lecturer at King's College Medical School, Orpington, BR6 8ND London, UK.
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBPrincess Royal University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn iatrogenic caecal perforation is rare, but a serious complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We present a 4min and 50s video on a new improvisation undertaken during laparoscopic management of post-polypectomy caecal perforation. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Our patient presented with an acute abdomen following endoscopic polypectomy. At surgery, the site of caecal perforation was close to the appendicular base with devitalization tissue, secondary to diathermy usage. The hallmark of safety within this novel technique included fresh healthy tissue margins within the endoloop (detachable snare ligation) and ensuring no ischemic tissue was gathered. Complete freeing of the appendix and meso-appendicular base was required and securing three endoloops proximal to the site of perforation. The post-operative course was uneventful. DISCUSSION: The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) 2013 guidelines suggested an early laparoscopic approach is a safe and effective treatment for colonoscopy-related colonic perforation. There are no national guidelines and the management is dictated by the clinical condition of the patient, co-morbidity, size and site of perforation as well as the scale of bowel preparation, and surgical experience.

conclusionThe endoloop technique described, undertaken during a laparoscopy is a novel approach. It is a simple and effective method, reminding clinicians to adapt techniques when necessary. Nevertheless, it is only limited to perforations around the appendicular base.

Indexed as

CaecalColonoscopyGeneral surgeryLaparoscopic surgeryPerforationPolypectomy

Identifiers

PMID25723744
PMCPMC4392367
OpenAlexW2143788612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.