Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25723738›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2015

Validation of Tuba1a as appropriate internal control for normalization of gene expression analysis during mouse lung development.

Aditi Mehta, Stephanie Dobersch, Reinhard H Dammann, Saverio Bellusci, Olga N Ilinskaya, Thomas Braun, Guillermo Barreto

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Regulatory role of Shh signaling pathway in lung development in fetal mice].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aditi MehtaLOEWE Research Group Lung Cancer Epigenetic, Max-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Parkstraße 1, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany. aditi.mehta@mpi-bn.mpg.de.
Stephanie DoberschLOEWE Research Group Lung Cancer Epigenetic, Max-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Parkstraße 1, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany. stephanie.dobersch@mpi-bn.mpg.de.
Reinhard H DammannUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Aulweg 130, 35392 Giessen, Germany. reinhard.dammann@gen.bio.uni-giessen.de.
Saverio BellusciUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Aulweg 130, 35392 Giessen, Germany. Olga.Ilinskaya@ksu.ru.
Olga N IlinskayaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St, 420008 Kazan, Russian Federation. Olga.Ilinskaya@ksu.ru.
Thomas BraunUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Aulweg 130, 35392 Giessen, Germany. Thomas.Braun@mpi-bn.mpg.de.
Guillermo BarretoLOEWE Research Group Lung Cancer Epigenetic, Max-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Parkstraße 1, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany. guillermo.barreto@mpi-bn.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expression ratio between the analysed gene and an internal control gene is the most widely used normalization method for quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) expression analysis. The ideal reference gene for a specific experiment is the one whose expression is not affected by the different experimental conditions tested. In this study, we validate the applicability of five commonly used reference genes during different stages of mouse lung development. The stability of expression of five different reference genes (Tuba1a, Actb Gapdh, Rn18S and Hist4h4) was calculated within five experimental groups using the statistical algorithm of geNorm software. Overall, Tuba1a showed the least variability in expression among the different stages of lung development, while Hist4h4 and Rn18S showed the maximum variability in their expression. Expression analysis of two lung specific markers, surfactant protein C (SftpC) and Clara cell-specific 10 kDA protein (Scgb1a1), normalized to each of the five reference genes tested here, confirmed our results and showed that incorrect reference gene choice can lead to artefacts. Moreover, a combination of two internal controls for normalization of expression analysis during lung development will increase the accuracy and reliability of results.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalActinsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBase SequenceFemaleGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesHistonesLungMice, Inbred C57BLMolecular Sequence DataPregnancyReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 18SActinsGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesHistonesRNA, Ribosomal, 18STuba1a protein, mouseTubulin

Identifiers

PMID25723738
PMCPMC4394432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.