ReviewThe British journal of radiology2015
Computerized PET/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response to therapy.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A Systematic Review of PET Textural Analysis and Radiomics in Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Opportunities and challenges to utilization of quantitative imaging: Report of the AAPM practical big data workshop.Medical physics · 2018Article
- Accurate segmenting of cervical tumors in PET imaging based on similarity between adjacent slices.Computers in biology and medicine · 2018Article
- In silico cancer research towards 3R.BMC cancer · 2018Review
- Adaptive region-growing with maximum curvature strategy for tumor segmentation inPhysics in medicine and biology · 2017Article
- Texture analysis of medical images for radiotherapy applications.The British journal of radiology · 2017Review
- Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for tumor response assessment-a review of clinical practices and radiomics studies.Translational cancer research · 2016Article
- Towards precision medicine: from quantitative imaging to radiomics.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. BReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current cancer therapy strategy is mostly population based, however, there are large differences in tumour response among patients. It is therefore important for treating physicians to know individual tumour response. In recent years, many studies proposed the use of computerized positron emission tomography/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response. Results showed that computerized analysis overcame some major limitations of current qualitative and semiquantitative analysis and led to improved accuracy. In this review, we summarize these studies in four steps of the analysis: image registration, tumour segmentation, image feature extraction and response evaluation. Future works are proposed and challenges described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.