Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25723465›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Follow-up of an asymptomatic Chagas disease population of children after treatment with nifurtimox (Lampit) in a sylvatic endemic transmission area of Colombia.

Fiorella Bianchi, Zulma Cucunubá, Felipe Guhl, Nadia Lorena González, Hector Freilij, Rubén Santiago Nicholls, Juan David Ramírez, Marleny Montilla, Astrid Carolina Flórez, Fernando Rosas and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Course of serological tests in treated subjects with chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New insights intoFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Characterization and Follow-Up ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fiorella BianchiCentro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Tropical, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Zulma CucunubáGrupo de Parasitología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Felipe GuhlCentro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Tropical, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Nadia Lorena GonzálezCentro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Tropical, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Hector FreilijPrograma Nacional de Control de Chagas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rubén Santiago NichollsGrupo de Parasitología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Juan David RamírezCentro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Tropical, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Marleny MontillaGrupo de Parasitología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Astrid Carolina FlórezGrupo de Parasitología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Fernando RosasClínica Abott Shaio, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Victor SaavedraCentro de Salud, Nunchía, Casanare, Colombia.
Nubia SilvaServinsalud Ltda., El Yopal, Casanare, Colombia.
Instituto Nacional de Salud · COUniversidad de Los Andes · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease is an anthropozoonosis caused by Trypanosoma cruzi. Two drugs are currently used for the etiological treatment of the disease: Nifurtimox (Lampit) and Benznidazole. This study presents a quasi-experimental trial (non-control group) of sixty-two patients who were treated for Chagas disease with Nifurtimox (Lampit), and were then followed for 30 months post-treatment. The safety of Nifurtimox (Lampit) for Chagas disease in this group of children primarily between 4 and 19 years old was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe 62 patients included in the study were selected when resulted seropositive for two out of three fundamentally different serological tests. All children were treated during two months according to protocols established by WHO. Monitoring was performed every twenty days to evaluate treatment safety. In 43 patients, two different serological tests: ELISA and IFAT; and two parasitological tests: blood culture, and real time PCR, (qPCR) were performed to assess therapeutic response, defined as post-treatment serological negativization. PRINCIPAL

findingsAll patients completed the treatment successfully, and six patients abandoned the post-treatment follow-up. Adverse effects occurred in 74% of patients, but only 4.8% of cases required temporary suspension to achieve 100% adherence to the 60-day treatment, and all symptoms reverted after treatment completion. Both parasite load (measured through qPCR) and antibodies (ELISA absorbance) evidenced a significant median reduction 6 months after treatment from 6.2 to 0.2 parasite equivalents/mL, and from 0.6 to 0.2 absorbance units respectively (p<0.001). Serological negativization by ELISA was evident since 6 months post-treatment, whereas by IFAT only after 18 months. Serological negativization by the two tests (ELISA and IFAT) was 41.9% (95%CI: 26.5-57.3) after 30 months post-treatment. qPCR was positive in 88.3% of patients pre-treatment and only in 12.1% of patients after 30 months. Survival analysis indicated that only 26.3% (95%CI: 15.5-44.8) persisted with negative qPCR during the whole follow-up period.

conclusionsNifurtimox was very well tolerated and successfully reduced parasite load and antibody titers. Re-infection, lysed parasites or a lack of anti-parasitic activity could explain these persistently positive qPCR cases.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAsymptomatic DiseasesChagas DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolColombiaDNA, ProtozoanFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNifurtimoxReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTrypanocidal AgentsTrypanosoma cruziDNA, ProtozoanNifurtimoxTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID25723465
PMCPMC4344301
OpenAlexW2033851224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.