ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Protein complexes in bacteria.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bacterial Systematic Genetics and Integrated Multi-Omics: Beyond Static Genomics Toward Predictive Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Next-generation proteomics for quantitative Jumbophage-bacteria interaction mapping.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The protein organization of a red blood cell.Cell reports · 2022Article
- Rapid Intraspecies Evolution of Fitness Effects of Yeast Genes.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Production of single cell protein from manure as animal feed by using photosynthetic bacteria.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Genes affecting progression of bacteriophage P22 infection in Salmonella identified by transposon and single gene deletion screens.Molecular microbiology · 2018Article
- Proteome Data Improves Protein Function Prediction in the Interactome ofMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2018Article
- Global landscape of cell envelope protein complexes in Escherichia coli.Nature biotechnology · 2018Article
- Bacterial protein meta-interactomes predict cross-species interactions and protein function.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- In silico identification of essential proteins in Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis based on protein-protein interaction networks.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Large-scale analyses of protein complexes have recently become available for Escherichia coli and Mycoplasma pneumoniae, yielding 443 and 116 heteromultimeric soluble protein complexes, respectively. We have coupled the results of these mass spectrometry-characterized protein complexes with the 285 "gold standard" protein complexes identified by EcoCyc. A comparison with databases of gene orthology, conservation, and essentiality identified proteins conserved or lost in complexes of other species. For instance, of 285 "gold standard" protein complexes in E. coli, less than 10% are fully conserved among a set of 7 distantly-related bacterial "model" species. Complex conservation follows one of three models: well-conserved complexes, complexes with a conserved core, and complexes with partial conservation but no conserved core. Expanding the comparison to 894 distinct bacterial genomes illustrates fractional conservation and the limits of co-conservation among components of protein complexes: just 14 out of 285 model protein complexes are perfectly conserved across 95% of the genomes used, yet we predict more than 180 may be partially conserved across at least half of the genomes. No clear relationship between gene essentiality and protein complex conservation is observed, as even poorly conserved complexes contain a significant number of essential proteins. Finally, we identify 183 complexes containing well-conserved components and uncharacterized proteins which will be interesting targets for future experimental studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.