Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25722959›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in allergy

Is The Allergen Really Needed in Allergy Immunotherapy?

Thomas M Kündig, Ludger Klimek, Philipp Schendzielorz, Wolfgang A Renner, Gabriela Senti, Martin F Bachmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in allergy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Perspective vaccines for emerging viral diseases in farm animals.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy User's Guide.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Comparative Review of Asthma in Farmers and Horses.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. DNA and mRNA vaccination against allergies.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas M KündigDermatology Department, Zurich University Hospital, Gloriastr. 31, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Ludger KlimekZentrum für Rhinologie und Allergologie, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Philipp SchendzielorzZentrum für Rhinologie und Allergologie, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Wolfgang A RennerAREBA Biotech AG, Kilchberg, Switzerland.
Gabriela SentiCenter for Clinical Trials, Zürich, Switzerland.
Martin F BachmannDermatology Department, Zurich University Hospital, Gloriastr. 31, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland ; National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy for type I allergies is well established and is regarded to be the most efficient treatment option besides allergen avoidance. As of today, different forms of allergen preparations are used in this regard, as well as different routes of application. Virus-like particles (VLPs) represent a potent vaccine platform with proven immunogenicity and clinical efficacy. The addition of toll-like receptor ligands and/or depot-forming adjuvants further enhances activation of innate as well as adaptive immune responses. CpG motifs represent intensively investigated and potent direct stimulators of plasmacytoid dendritic cells and B cells, while T cell responses are enhanced indirectly through increased antigen presentation and cytokine release. This article will focus on the function of VLPs loaded with DNA rich in nonmethylated CG motifs (CpGs) and the clinical experience gained in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, demonstrating clinical efficacy also if administered without allergens. Several published studies have demonstrated a beneficial impact on allergic symptoms by treatment with CpG-loaded VLPs. Subcutaneous injection of VLPs loaded with CpGs was tested with or without the adjuvant alum in the presence or absence of an allergen. The results encourage further investigation of VLPs and CpG motifs in immunotherapy, either as a stand-alone product or as adjuvants for allergen-specific immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Allergic rhinitisAllergyCpG motifsImmunotherapyVaccineVirus-like particles

Identifiers

PMID25722959
PMCPMC4335088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.