Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25722951›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2015

The neurophysiology of biological motion perception in schizophrenia.

Carol Jahshan, Jonathan K Wynn, Kristopher I Mathis, Michael F Green

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reading body and face language in male schizophrenia.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carol JahshanMental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles, California ; Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, California.
Jonathan K WynnMental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles, California ; Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, California.
Kristopher I MathisMental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles, California ; Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, California.
Michael F GreenMental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Los Angeles, California ; Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, California.
Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

The Genetics of Endophenotypes and SchizophreniaR01MH065707 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GREEN, MICHAEL F. · 2003 to 2013
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ability to recognize human biological motion is a fundamental aspect of social cognition that is impaired in people with schizophrenia. However, little is known about the neural substrates of impaired biological motion perception in schizophrenia. In the current study, we assessed event-related potentials (ERPs) to human and nonhuman movement in schizophrenia.

methodsTwenty-four subjects with schizophrenia and 18 healthy controls completed a biological motion task while their electroencephalography (EEG) was simultaneously recorded. Subjects watched clips of point-light animations containing 100%, 85%, or 70% biological motion, and were asked to decide whether the clip resembled human or nonhuman movement. Three ERPs were examined: P1, N1, and the late positive potential (LPP).

resultsBehaviorally, schizophrenia subjects identified significantly fewer stimuli as human movement compared to healthy controls in the 100% and 85% conditions. At the neural level, P1 was reduced in the schizophrenia group but did not differ among conditions in either group. There were no group differences in N1 but both groups had the largest N1 in the 70% condition. There was a condition × group interaction for the LPP: Healthy controls had a larger LPP to 100% versus 85% and 70% biological motion; there was no difference among conditions in schizophrenia subjects.

conclusionsConsistent with previous findings, schizophrenia subjects were impaired in their ability to recognize biological motion. The EEG results showed that biological motion did not influence the earliest stage of visual processing (P1). Although schizophrenia subjects showed the same pattern of N1 results relative to healthy controls, they were impaired at a later stage (LPP), reflecting a dysfunction in the identification of human form in biological versus nonbiological motion stimuli.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsMotion PerceptionAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSchizophreniaTime FactorsYoung AdultBiological motionelectroencephalographyevent-related potentialschizophreniavisual perception

Identifiers

PMID25722951
PMCPMC4321396
OpenAlexW2059024885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.