ArticleGenome medicine2015
Development of cancer genetic services in the UK: A national consultation.
Article in Genome medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current Genetic Service Delivery Models for the Provision of Genetic Testing in Europe: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Pooled it
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial.British journal of cancer · 2024Trial
- A digital pathway for genetic testing in UK NHS patients with cancer: BRCA-DIRECT randomised study internal pilot.Journal of medical genetics · 2022Trial
- Universal tumor screening and mainstream genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Exploring willingness to pay out-of-pocket for genetic testing among ovarian cancer patients in Malaysia, a middle-income country in Asia.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Observational
- Exploring the hereditary genetic mutational landscape of breast and ovarian cancer in Estonia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hereditary genetic testing and mainstreaming: a guide for surgeons.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2024Article
- ItaLynch: an ongoing Italian study to evaluate the feasibility of mainstreaming the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis: Common pitfalls in genetic testing.Singapore medical journal · 2023Article
- An Accessible Communication System for Population-Based Genetic Testing: Development and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Multisystem Proteinopathy Due toGenes · 2022Review
- Half of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants found on panel tests do not fulfil NHS testing criteria.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Cascading After Peridiagnostic Cancer Genetic Testing: An Alternative to Population-Based Screening.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020Article
- From Targeting Somatic Mutations to Finding Inherited Cancer Predispositions: The Other Side of the Coin.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Moving into the mainstream: healthcare professionals' views of implementing treatment focussed genetic testing in breast cancer care.Familial cancer · 2019Article
- Ensuring Best Practice in Genomic Education and Evaluation: A Program Logic Approach.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment.PharmacoEconomics · 2018Article
- Patients' Views of Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing (TFGT): Some Lessons for the Mainstreaming of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
- Evaluation of a Streamlined Oncologist-Led BRCA Mutation Testing and Counseling Model for Patients With Ovarian Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018Observational
- Impact of a genetic counseling requirement prior to genetic testing.BMC health services research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTechnological advances in DNA sequencing have made gene testing fast and affordable, but there are challenges to the translation of these improvements for patient benefit. The Mainstreaming Cancer Genetics (MCG) programme is exploiting advances in DNA sequencing to develop the infrastructure, processes and capabilities required for cancer gene testing to become routinely available to all those that can benefit.
methodsThe MCG programme held a consultation day to discuss the development of cancer genetics with senior representation from all 24 UK cancer genetic centres. The current service landscape and capacity for expansion was assessed through structured questionnaires. Workshop discussion addressed the opportunities and challenges to increasing cancer gene testing in the National Health Service (NHS).
resultsServices vary with respect to population served and models of service delivery, and with respect to methods and thresholds for determining risk and testing eligibility. Almost all centres want to offer more cancer gene testing (82%) and reported increasing demand for testing from non-genetic clinical colleagues (92%). Reported challenges to increasing testing include the complexity of interpreting the resulting genetic data (79%), the level of funding and complexity of commissioning (67%), the limited capacity of current processes and cross-disciplinary relationships (38%), and workforce education (29%).
conclusionsPriorities to address include the development and evaluation of models of increasing access to gene testing, the optimal process for interpretation of large-scale genetic data, implementation of appropriate commissioning and funding processes, and achieving national consistency. The UK cancer genetics community have high expertise and strong commitment to maximising scientific advances for improved patient benefit and should be pivotally involved in the implementation of increased cancer gene testing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.