Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25722664›Full record

ArticleNatural computing

Utilising a simulation platform to understand the effect of domain model assumptions.

Kieran Alden, Paul S Andrews, Henrique Veiga-Fernandes, Jon Timmis, Mark Coles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Natural computing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kieran AldenYork Computational Immunology Lab, University of York, York, UK ; Centre for Immunology and Infection, University of York and Hull York Medical School, York, UK.
Paul S AndrewsYork Computational Immunology Lab, University of York, York, UK ; Department of Computer Science, University of York, York, UK.
Henrique Veiga-FernandesInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jon TimmisYork Computational Immunology Lab, University of York, York, UK ; Department of Electronics, University of York, York, UK.
Mark ColesYork Computational Immunology Lab, University of York, York, UK ; Centre for Immunology and Infection, University of York and Hull York Medical School, York, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601156Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational and mathematical modelling approaches are increasingly being adopted in attempts to further our understanding of complex biological systems. This approach can be subjected to strong criticism as substantial aspects of the biological system being captured are not currently known, meaning assumptions need to be made that could have a critical impact on simulation response. We have utilised the CoSMoS process in the development of an agent-based simulation of the formation of Peyer's patches (PP), gut-associated lymphoid organs that have a key role in the initiation of adaptive immune responses to infection. Although the use of genetic tools, imaging technologies and ex vivo culture systems has provided significant insight into the cellular components and associated pathways involved in PP development, interesting questions remain that cannot be addressed using these approaches, and as such well justified assumptions have been introduced into our model to counter this. Here we focus not on the development of the model itself, but instead demonstrate how the resultant simulation can be used to assess how these assumptions impact the simulation response. For example, we consider the impact of our assumption that the migration rate of lymphoid tissue cells into the gut remains constant throughout PP development. We demonstrate that an analysis of the assumptions made in the construction of the domain model may either increase confidence in the model as a representation of the biological system it captures, or may suggest areas where further biological experimentation is required.

Indexed as

Model compositionPeyer’s patchesSimulationStatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID25722664
PMCPMC4333240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.