ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2015
Twenty-five years of breast cancer risk models and their applications.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk-reducing medications for primary breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Review
- Validation of the Mirai model for predicting breast cancer risk in Mexican women.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Risk-management decision-making data from a community-based sample of racially diverse women at high risk of breast cancer: rationale, methods, and sample characteristics of the Daughter Sister Mother Project survey.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Weighing risks and benefits in the presence of competing risks.Current epidemiology reports · 2023Article
- Variability Among Breast Cancer Risk Classification Models When Applied at the Level of the Individual Woman.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tools for Stratifying Women into Risk Groups: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- The Landmark Series-Addressing Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: New Recommendations for Black Women.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Review
- Predicting breast cancer risk in a racially diverse, community-based sample of potentially high-risk women.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Tools for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision Making.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Article
- Functions of Breast Cancer Predisposition Genes: Implications for Clinical Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Overlap of high-risk individuals predicted by family history, and genetic and non-genetic breast cancer risk prediction models: implications for risk stratification.BMC medicine · 2022Article
- A Personal Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Model Using Common Variants and Environmental Risk Factors in Japanese Females.Cancers · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: 2020 Summative Review.Pancreas · 2021Review
- Inflammation markers on benign breast biopsy are associated with risk of invasive breast cancer in African American women.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Article
- Investigation of the significance of population-based breast cancer screening among women aged under 40 years.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- Nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission in postoperative infection and mortality: analysis of 14 798 procedures.The British journal of surgery · 2020Article
- Criteria for evaluating risk prediction of multiple outcomes.Statistical methods in medical research · 2020Article
- Estrogen receptors genotypes and canine mammary neoplasia.BMC veterinary research · 2019Article
- Imbalances in cellular immunological parameters in blood predetermine tumor onset in a natural mouse model of breast cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.