Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25722348›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2016

Can clinical signs, clinicopathological findings and abdominal ultrasonography predict the site of histopathological abnormalities of the alimentary tract in cats?

Valerie Freiche, Mathieu R Faucher, Alexander J German

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ACVIM consensus statement on pancreatitis in cats.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2021
    Article
  3. Feline comorbidities: What do we really know about feline triaditis?Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Diagnostic laparotomies.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valerie FreicheInternal Medicine Unit, National Veterinary School of Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Mathieu R FaucherVeterinary Alliance Clinic, Bordeaux, France.
Alexander J GermanDepartment of Obesity and Endocrinology, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK ajgerman@liverpool.ac.uk.
École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMany cats with gastrointestinal signs have coexisting abnormalities in the intestine, liver and pancreas. Investigations typically involve clinicopathological tests, diagnostic imaging and biopsy, either at coeliotomy or by non-invasive means. While exploratory coeliotomy enables all organs to be sampled simultaneously, it is invasive and might not be necessary. The aim of the current study was to assess the performance of preliminary clinical information in predicting the histopathological presence of abnormalities in alimentary tract organs in cats.

methodsThe records of 38 cats with alimentary tract signs, which had ultimately undergone exploratory coeliotomy and surgical biopsy, were reviewed. The clinical signs, clinicopathological findings, diagnostic imaging findings and histopathology results were reviewed.

resultsOn histopathological analysis, lesions were detected in 29/37 (78%) liver biopsies, in 29/35 (83%) gastrointestinal biopsies and in 17/37 (46%) pancreatic samples, the majority of which were inflammatory in nature. Clinical signs were generally poor markers of the presence of lesions in the alimentary tract. Further, while liver enzyme activity was relatively specific (88-100%) for detecting histopathological abnormalities in the liver, sensitivity was poor (11-50%). Pancreatic histopathological abnormalities were present in 1/3 of the cats with a positive pancreas-specific lipase result, and in 6/8 cats with a negative result. While relatively specific (57-100%) for both intestinal (57-100%) and hepatic (71-80%) histopathological abnormalities, abdominal ultrasonography lacked sensitivity for both organs (intestine 50-80%; liver 20-25%). In contrast, ultrasonography was relatively sensitive (50-80%), but not specific (17-22%) for detecting pancreatic lesions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Clinical signs, and clinicopathological and ultrasonographic abnormalities lack precision for hepatic and pancreatic histopathological lesions in cats with alimentary tract signs, and cannot reliably predict from which organs biopsies should be collected. Arguably, therefore, exploratory coeliotomy is necessary to determine the site of histopathological abnormalities in feline alimentary tract disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsCat DiseasesCatsEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastrointestinal DiseasesIntestine, SmallKidneyLiverPancreasRadiography, AbdominalRetrospective StudiesStomach DiseasesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID25722348
PMCPMC11149018
OpenAlexW2045692010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.