Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25722291›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2015

Immunogenicity and Safety of an EB66 Cell-Culture-Derived Influenza A/Indonesia/5/2005(H5N1) AS03-Adjuvanted Vaccine: A Phase 1 Randomized Trial.

Anne Schuind, Nathan Segall, Mamadou Drame, Bruce L Innis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01236040 (Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GSK Biologicals' Cell Culture Derived Pandemic Influenza Vaccines GSK2590066A and GSK2592984A Administered to Healthy Adults 18 - 49 Years Old), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01236040 phase1completednot on this map

Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GSK Biologicals' Cell Culture Derived Pandemic Influenza Vaccines GSK2590066A and GSK2592984A Administered to Healthy Adults 18 - 49 Years Old

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2010 to 2012Enrolled521ConditionsInfluenzaArmsGSK Biologicals' investigational vaccine GSK2590066A, GSK Biologicals' investigational vaccine GSK2592984A, GSK Biologicals' investigational vaccine GSK2340274A, GSK Biologicals' investigational vaccine GSK2340273A, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Animal Cell Expression Systems.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  7. Genes · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne SchuindGSK Vaccines, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Nathan SegallClinical Research Atlanta, Stockbridge, Georgia.
Mamadou DrameGSK Vaccines, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Bruce L InnisGSK Vaccines, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USClinical Research Atlanta · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell-culture-derived (CC) influenza vaccine production methods could provide benefits over classical embryonated-egg technology, including a higher production capacity and the faster creation of a supply that meets demand.

methodsA CC-inactivated split-virus influenza A/Indonesia/5/2005(H5N1) vaccine derived from the EB66 cell line (hereafter, "CC-H5N1") was investigated in a phase 1 randomized, blinded study. Healthy adults (n = 521) received 2 vaccine doses (days 0 and 21) of either investigational CC-H5N1 vaccine (1.9 µg or 3.75 µg of hemagglutinin antigen [HA] with the AS03 adjuvant system or 15 µg of plain HA), embryonated-egg-derived vaccines (3.75 µg of HA with AS03 or 15 µg of plain HA), or placebo. Assessment of the adjuvant effect and immunogenicity was performed using Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research acceptability criteria 21 days after dose 2. Safety was assessed until month 12.

resultsAS03-adjuvanted CC-H5N1 elicited a homologous hemagglutination inhibition antibody response that satisfied immunogenicity criteria 21 days after dose 2 and persisted at month 12. Adjuvant effect and immune response against a drift-variant strain were demonstrated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. The immunogenicity and safety of the CC-H5N1 formulation containing 3.75 µg of HA and AS03 appeared to be similar to those for the licensed egg-derived AS03-adjuvanted control vaccine.

conclusionsThe feasibility of the EB66 cell line to produce an immunogenic influenza vaccine with acceptable safety profile was demonstrated. Antigen sparing was achieved through combination with AS03 adjuvant. This CC-H5N1 might contribute to the rapid access of vaccine in the event of an influenza A(H5N1) pandemic. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01236040.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdolescentAdultalpha-TocopherolAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCell LineDrug CombinationsDucksEmbryonic Stem CellsFemaleHumansInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleAdjuvants, Immunologicalpha-TocopherolAntibodies, ViralAS03 adjuvantDrug CombinationsInfluenza VaccinesPolysorbatesSqualeneAS03cell cultureinfluenza A(H5N1)pandemic influenza vaccine

Identifiers

PMID25722291
PMCPMC4512608
OpenAlexW2048030544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.