ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2015
Insights from 20 years of bacterial genome sequencing.
Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 346 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
346 citing papers in PubMed, 727 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromosome-level genome and transcriptome analysis ofVirulence · 2026Article
- Feasibility and pitfalls of combining small subpopulations for genome-wide association analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) kernel traits.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Large-scale benchmarking of prokaryotic annotation tools across thousands of species.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Ecological theory sheds light on plasmid diversity and dynamics.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Stop codon reassignment to tryptophan in members of the bacterial phylumMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Phenotypic and Genomic Divergence in Biofilm Formation in STEC and Non-STECPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Functional diversity and ecological consequences of endophytic Bacillus-plant interactions.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Panorama: A robust pangenome-based method for predicting and comparing biological systems across species.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Exploring shotgun metagenomic data to detect microeukaryotic pathogens in wildlife.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Whole-proteome structure/function prediction in UropathogenicbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Computational identification of antigens and development of a multi-epitope vaccine for bacterial vaginosis caused by Gardnerella vaginalis.Amino acids · 2026Article
- GIPSy2: high-performance and scalable genomic island prediction software.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Comprehensive Genomic Characterization of the Marine Isolate Exiguobacterium profundum SW22: Insights into Adaptive Mechanisms and Biosynthetic Potential.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Tailoring Corynebacterium glutamicum for Sustainable Biomanufacturing: From Traditional to Cutting-Edge Technologies.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- PyamilySeq: exposing the fragility of conventional gene (re)clustering and prokaryotic pangenomic inference methods.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Soil microbiome prediction using traditional machine learning and deep learning models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evolutionary constraints on RNA polymerase gene positioning in the genome of fast-growing bacteria.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Genomics of Extremophiles and Archaea".Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Article
286 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the first two complete bacterial genome sequences were published in 1995, the science of bacteria has dramatically changed. Using third-generation DNA sequencing, it is possible to completely sequence a bacterial genome in a few hours and identify some types of methylation sites along the genome as well. Sequencing of bacterial genome sequences is now a standard procedure, and the information from tens of thousands of bacterial genomes has had a major impact on our views of the bacterial world. In this review, we explore a series of questions to highlight some insights that comparative genomics has produced. To date, there are genome sequences available from 50 different bacterial phyla and 11 different archaeal phyla. However, the distribution is quite skewed towards a few phyla that contain model organisms. But the breadth is continuing to improve, with projects dedicated to filling in less characterized taxonomic groups. The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas system provides bacteria with immunity against viruses, which outnumber bacteria by tenfold. How fast can we go? Second-generation sequencing has produced a large number of draft genomes (close to 90 % of bacterial genomes in GenBank are currently not complete); third-generation sequencing can potentially produce a finished genome in a few hours, and at the same time provide methlylation sites along the entire chromosome. The diversity of bacterial communities is extensive as is evident from the genome sequences available from 50 different bacterial phyla and 11 different archaeal phyla. Genome sequencing can help in classifying an organism, and in the case where multiple genomes of the same species are available, it is possible to calculate the pan- and core genomes; comparison of more than 2000 Escherichia coli genomes finds an E. coli core genome of about 3100 gene families and a total of about 89,000 different gene families. Why do we care about bacterial genome sequencing? There are many practical applications, such as genome-scale metabolic modeling, biosurveillance, bioforensics, and infectious disease epidemiology. In the near future, high-throughput sequencing of patient metagenomic samples could revolutionize medicine in terms of speed and accuracy of finding pathogens and knowing how to treat them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.