ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2016
Continuous cardiac output measurement by un-calibrated pulse wave analysis and pulmonary artery catheter in patients with septic shock.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agreement of minimally invasive pulse wave analysis with pulmonary artery and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of Pulse Indicator Continuous Cardiac Output Monitoring on Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Agreement between continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Noninvasive pulse contour analysis for determination of cardiac output in patients with chronic heart failure.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018Trial
- Automated hemodynamic resuscitation system for computer-controlled norepinephrine, vasopressin, and fluid therapy in endotoxin-induced shock: a feasibility and physiological proof-of-concept study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Testing an inverse modeling approach with gradient boosting regression for stroke volume estimation using patient thermodilution data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Cardiac output estimated from an uncalibrated radial blood pressure waveform: validation in anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Agreement between continuous cardiac output measured by the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system and a pulmonary artery catheter in adult liver transplantation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Contemporary Review of Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critical Care Setting.US cardiology · 2022Review
- Validation of a Non-invasive Inverse Problem-Solving Method for Stroke Volume.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Right ventricular stroke volume assessed by pulmonary artery pulse contour analysis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2020Article
- Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2018Article
- Prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients: the performance of seven different functional hemodynamic parameters.BMC anesthesiology · 2018Article
- Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2017Article
- [Heart in sepsis : Molecular mechanisms, diagnosis and therapy of septic cardiomyopathy].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Review
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2017Review
- Comparison of pulmonary artery catheter, echocardiography, and arterial waveform analysis monitoring in predicting the hemodynamic state during and after cardiac surgery.International journal of critical illness and injury scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Septic shock is a serious medical condition. With increased concerns about invasive techniques, a number of non-invasive and semi-invasive devices measuring cardiac output (CO) have become commercially available. The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy, precision and trending abilities of the FloTrac and the continuous pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution technique determining CO in septic shock patients. Consecutive septic shock patients were included in two centres and CO was measured every 4 h up to 48 h by FloTrac (APCO) and by pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) using the continuous (CCO) and intermittent (ICO) technique. Forty-seven septic shock patients with 326 matched sets of APCO, CCO and ICO data were available for analysis. Bland and Altman analysis revealed a mean bias ±2 SD of 0.0 ± 2.14 L min(-1) for APCO-ICO (%error = 34.5 %) and 0.23 ± 2.55 L min(-1) for CCO-ICO (%error = 40.4 %). Trend analysis showed a concordance of 85 and 81 % for APCO and CCO, respectively. In contrast to CCO, APCO was influenced by systemic vascular resistance and by mean arterial pressure. In septic shock patients, APCO measurements assessed by FloTrac but also the established CCO measurements using the PAC did not meet the currently accepted statistical criteria indicating acceptable clinical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.