ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2015
Brain-computer interface users speak up: the Virtual Users' Forum at the 2013 International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting.
Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Brain-Computer Interfaces Systems for Upper and Lower Limb Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- Intraoperative Techniques for Language Mapping in Brain Surgery: A Comparison Between Direct Electrical Stimulation (DES) and Electrocorticography (ECoG).Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- Implications of shared motor and perceptual activations on the sensorimotor cortex for neuroprosthetic decoding.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- A streaming brain-to-voice neuroprosthesis to restore naturalistic communication.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- How People Living With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Use Personalized Automatic Speech Recognition Technology to Support Communication.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- A bilingual speech neuroprosthesis driven by cortical articulatory representations shared between languages.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- The speech neuroprosthesis.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Ethical issues raised by incorporating personalized language models into brain-computer interface communication technologies: a qualitative study of individuals with neurological disease.Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2024Article
- What stakeholders with neurodegenerative conditions value about speech and accuracy in development of BCI systems for communication.Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) · 2024Article
- It takes two (seconds): decreasing encoding time for two-choice functional near-infrared spectroscopy brain-computer interface communication.Neurophotonics · 2023Article
- Article
- Recommendations for promoting user agency in the design of speech neuroprostheses.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- A Virtual Reality Muscle-Computer Interface for Neurorehabilitation in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Brain-computer interfaces for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Muscle & nerve · 2020Review
- Trends in research participant categories and descriptions in abstracts from the International BCI Meeting series, 1999 to 2016.Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) · 2019Article
- Effects of simulated visual acuity and ocular motility impairments on SSVEP brain-computer interface performance: An experiment with Shuffle Speller.Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) · 2018Article
- EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2017Article
- Heading for new shores! Overcoming pitfalls in BCI design.Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) · 2017Article
- SOLICITING BCI USER EXPERIENCE FEEDBACK FROM PEOPLE WITH SEVERE SPEECH AND PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS.Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) · 2016Article
- Huffman and linear scanning methods with statistical language models.Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
More than 300 researchers gathered at the 2013 International Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Meeting to discuss current practice and future goals for BCI research and development. The authors organized the Virtual Users' Forum at the meeting to provide the BCI community with feedback from users. We report on the Virtual Users' Forum, including initial results from ongoing research being conducted by 2 BCI groups. Online surveys and in-person interviews were used to solicit feedback from people with disabilities who are expert and novice BCI users. For the Virtual Users' Forum, their responses were organized into 4 major themes: current (non-BCI) communication methods, experiences with BCI research, challenges of current BCIs, and future BCI developments. Two authors with severe disabilities gave presentations during the Virtual Users' Forum, and their comments are integrated with the other results. While participants' hopes for BCIs of the future remain high, their comments about available systems mirror those made by consumers about conventional assistive technology. They reflect concerns about reliability (eg, typing accuracy/speed), utility (eg, applications and the desire for real-time interactions), ease of use (eg, portability and system setup), and support (eg, technical support and caregiver training). People with disabilities, as target users of BCI systems, can provide valuable feedback and input on the development of BCI as an assistive technology. To this end, participatory action research should be considered as a valuable methodology for future BCI research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.