Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25721354›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2015

Cellular immunity and cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction: role of neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages.

Hisahito Shinagawa, Stefan Frantz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. On the trail of the obesity paradox.Annals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cardioprotective Potential of Exogenous Ubiquitin.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hisahito ShinagawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
Stefan Frantz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, innate immunity is recognized as an important pathophysiologic factor and therapeutic target for cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI). The innate immune system exerts its function via soluble and cellular components. Recently, function and kinetics of immune cells after MI have been clarified using new innovative technology. Therefore, herein, we will discuss the function of neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages in the pathophysiology of cardiac remodeling after MI in basic as well as clinical science.

Indexed as

HumansImmunity, CellularLeukocyte CountMacrophagesMonocytesMyocardial InfarctionNeutrophil InfiltrationNeutrophilsPrognosisVentricular Remodeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.