Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25721304›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2015

Suppression of contractile activity in the small intestine by indomethacin and omeprazole.

Lenard M Lichtenberger, Deepa Bhattarai, Tri M Phan, Elizabeth J Dial, Karen Uray

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Histamine HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lenard M LichtenbergerDepartment of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Deepa BhattaraiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas; and.
Tri M PhanDepartment of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Elizabeth J DialDepartment of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Karen UrayDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas; and karen.l.davis@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

Tissue Analysis & Molecular Imaging CoreP30DK056338 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI James Versalovic · 2001 to 2026
$28.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK56338NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used to treat a number of conditions, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often used to prevent NSAID-induced gastric mucosal damage; however, the effects of NSAIDs on intestinal motility are poorly understood. The purpose of the present study is to determine the effects of a prototypical NSAID, indomethacin, either alone or in conjunction with the PPI omeprazole, on intestinal motility. Rats were randomly divided into four groups treated with vehicle, omeprazole, indomethacin, or a combination of indomethacin and omeprazole. Intestinal motility and transit were measured along with inflammatory mediators in the intestinal smooth muscle, markers of mucosal damage, and bacterial counts in the intestinal wall. Indomethacin, but not omeprazole, caused mucosal injury indicated by lower gut bleeding; however, both omeprazole and indomethacin suppressed contractile activity and frequency in the distal part of the small intestine. Cotreatment with omeprazole did not reduce indomethacin-induced intestinal bleeding. Furthermore, although indomethacin caused increased inflammation as indicated by increased edema development and inflammatory mediators, cotreatment with omeprazole did not reduce inflammation in the intestinal smooth muscle or prevent the increased bacterial count in the intestinal wall induced by indomethacin. We conclude that both NSAID and PPI treatment suppressed contractile activity in the distal regions of the small intestine. The suppression of intestinal contractility was associated with increased inflammation in both cases; however, indomethacin and omeprazole appear to affect intestinal motility by different mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBiomarkersEnteritisGastrointestinal HemorrhageGastrointestinal MotilityIleumIndomethacinInflammation MediatorsJejunumMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SmoothOmeprazoleProton Pump InhibitorsRats, Sprague-DawleyAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBiomarkersIndomethacinInflammation MediatorsOmeprazoleProton Pump Inhibitorsindomethacininflammationintestinal motilityomeprazole

Identifiers

PMID25721304
PMCPMC4421016
OpenAlexW2100408946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.