Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25721094›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Predicting clinical response to anticancer drugs using an ex vivo platform that captures tumour heterogeneity.

Biswanath Majumder, Ulaganathan Baraneedharan, Saravanan Thiyagarajan, Padhma Radhakrishnan, Harikrishna Narasimhan, Muthu Dhandapani, Nilesh Brijwani, Dency D Pinto, Arun Prasath, Basavaraja U Shanthappa and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 306 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Biswanath MajumderMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Ulaganathan BaraneedharanMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Saravanan ThiyagarajanMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Padhma RadhakrishnanMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Harikrishna NarasimhanIndian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Muthu DhandapaniMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Nilesh BrijwaniMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Dency D PintoMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Arun PrasathMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Basavaraja U ShanthappaMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Allen ThayakumarMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Rajagopalan SurendranGovernment Stanley Medical College, Chennai 600001, India.
Govind K BabuKidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore 560030, India.
Ashok M ShenoyKidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore 560030, India.
Moni A KuriakoseMazumdar-Shaw Cancer Center, Bangalore 560099, India.
Guillaume BergtholdThe Broad Institute of The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Peleg Horowitz1] The Broad Institute of The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA [2] Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [3] Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Massimo Loda1] The Broad Institute of The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA [2] Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Rameen Beroukhim1] Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [2] Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Shivani AgarwalIndian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Shiladitya Sengupta1] Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [2] India Innovation Research Center, New Delhi 110092, India [3] Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Mallikarjun SundaramMitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India.
Pradip K Majumder1] Mitra Biotech, Bangalore 560099, India [2] India Innovation Research Center, New Delhi 110092, India.
Mitra Biotech (India) · INHarvard University · USIndian Institute of Science Bangalore · INKidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology · INBrigham and Women's Hospital · USInnovation Center Denmark · INMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USMazumdar Shaw Medical Foundation · INStanley Medical College · IN

Funding

Tumor and Circulating Markers as Links Between Obesity and Lethal Prostate CanceP50CA090381 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI LODA, MASSIMO · 2002 to 2017
$36.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting clinical response to anticancer drugs remains a major challenge in cancer treatment. Emerging reports indicate that the tumour microenvironment and heterogeneity can limit the predictive power of current biomarker-guided strategies for chemotherapy. Here we report the engineering of personalized tumour ecosystems that contextually conserve the tumour heterogeneity, and phenocopy the tumour microenvironment using tumour explants maintained in defined tumour grade-matched matrix support and autologous patient serum. The functional response of tumour ecosystems, engineered from 109 patients, to anticancer drugs, together with the corresponding clinical outcomes, is used to train a machine learning algorithm; the learned model is then applied to predict the clinical response in an independent validation group of 55 patients, where we achieve 100% sensitivity in predictions while keeping specificity in a desired high range. The tumour ecosystem and algorithm, together termed the CANScript technology, can emerge as a powerful platform for enabling personalized medicine.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnalysis of VarianceAntineoplastic AgentsChromatography, LiquidDNA Mutational AnalysisExtracellular Matrix ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMachine LearningMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPrecision MedicinePredictive Value of TestsTandem Mass SpectrometryTissue EngineeringTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsExtracellular Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25721094
PMCPMC4351621
OpenAlexW1963654222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.