ReviewJournal of biomedical informatics2015
Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review.
Review in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 194 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
194 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Development and testing of a public health emergency intelligence analysis system based on text analysis and NLP analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Pooled it
- Ethical and Methodological Considerations of Twitter Data for Public Health Research: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Exploration of the core protein network under endometriosis symptomatology using a computational approach.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic literature review of machine learning in online personal health data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review.American journal of public health · 2017Pooled it
- Systematic review on the prevalence, frequency and comparative value of adverse events data in social media.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Pooled it
- Agent-specific bleeding signatures in non-hypertensive versus hypertensive patients exposed to oral anticoagulants: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Self-Reported Health Outcomes in Metabolic Health YouTube Comments: Cross-Sectional Study and Rule-Based Natural Language Processing Framework Development and Validation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Multi-Output Probabilistic Prediction of Drug Side Effects Using Classical Machine Learning Algorithms.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Topic and Sentiment Trends in Semaglutide Discussions on X: Subpopulation-Based Longitudinal Analysis.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026Article
- Computational pharmacovigilance of Lifitegrast in dry eye disease using machine learning and network toxicology.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- myAURA: a personalized health library for epilepsy management via knowledge graph sparsification and visualization.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- What do cancer patients discuss online regarding CINV management? A social media-based topic modeling study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Assessing patient perceptions of off-label cannabidiol use for insomnia through sentiment analysis.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- Monitoring Opioid-Related Social Media Chatter Using Natural Language Processing and Large Language Models: Temporal Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Automated Extraction of Mortality Information From Publicly Available Sources Using Large Language Models: Development and Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Focused digital cohort selection from social media using the metric backbone of biomedical knowledge graphs.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- Historical Process, Status and Future Development of Pharmacovigilance Systems in Chinese Medicine.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Monitoring the opioid epidemic via social media discussions.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
134 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAutomatic monitoring of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), defined as adverse patient outcomes caused by medications, is a challenging research problem that is currently receiving significant attention from the medical informatics community. In recent years, user-posted data on social media, primarily due to its sheer volume, has become a useful resource for ADR monitoring. Research using social media data has progressed using various data sources and techniques, making it difficult to compare distinct systems and their performances. In this paper, we perform a methodical review to characterize the different approaches to ADR detection/extraction from social media, and their applicability to pharmacovigilance. In addition, we present a potential systematic pathway to ADR monitoring from social media.
methodsWe identified studies describing approaches for ADR detection from social media from the Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases, and the Google Scholar search engine. Studies that met our inclusion criteria were those that attempted to extract ADR information posted by users on any publicly available social media platform. We categorized the studies according to different characteristics such as primary ADR detection approach, size of corpus, data source(s), availability, and evaluation criteria.
resultsTwenty-two studies met our inclusion criteria, with fifteen (68%) published within the last two years. However, publicly available annotated data is still scarce, and we found only six studies that made the annotations used publicly available, making system performance comparisons difficult. In terms of algorithms, supervised classification techniques to detect posts containing ADR mentions, and lexicon-based approaches for extraction of ADR mentions from texts have been the most popular.
conclusionOur review suggests that interest in the utilization of the vast amounts of available social media data for ADR monitoring is increasing. In terms of sources, both health-related and general social media data have been used for ADR detection-while health-related sources tend to contain higher proportions of relevant data, the volume of data from general social media websites is significantly higher. There is still very limited amount of annotated data publicly available , and, as indicated by the promising results obtained by recent supervised learning approaches, there is a strong need to make such data available to the research community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.