Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25720841›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical informatics2015

Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review.

Abeed Sarker, Rachel Ginn, Azadeh Nikfarjam, Karen O'Connor, Karen Smith, Swetha Jayaraman, Tejaswi Upadhaya, Graciela Gonzalez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 194 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
194citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

194 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A systematic literature review of machine learning in online personal health data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review.American journal of public health · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

134 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abeed SarkerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, United States. Electronic address: abeed.sarker@asu.edu.
Rachel GinnDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
Azadeh NikfarjamDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
Karen O'ConnorDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
Karen SmithRueckert-Hartman College for Health Professions, Regis University, Denver, CO, United States.
Swetha JayaramanSchool of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Tejaswi UpadhayaSchool of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Graciela GonzalezDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.

Funding

Social Media Mining for PharmacovigilanceR01LM011176 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GONZALEZ HERNANDEZ, GRACIELA, SHEN, LI · 2012 to 2021
$4.5M
NLM NIH HHS 1R01LM011176-01NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAutomatic monitoring of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), defined as adverse patient outcomes caused by medications, is a challenging research problem that is currently receiving significant attention from the medical informatics community. In recent years, user-posted data on social media, primarily due to its sheer volume, has become a useful resource for ADR monitoring. Research using social media data has progressed using various data sources and techniques, making it difficult to compare distinct systems and their performances. In this paper, we perform a methodical review to characterize the different approaches to ADR detection/extraction from social media, and their applicability to pharmacovigilance. In addition, we present a potential systematic pathway to ADR monitoring from social media.

methodsWe identified studies describing approaches for ADR detection from social media from the Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases, and the Google Scholar search engine. Studies that met our inclusion criteria were those that attempted to extract ADR information posted by users on any publicly available social media platform. We categorized the studies according to different characteristics such as primary ADR detection approach, size of corpus, data source(s), availability, and evaluation criteria.

resultsTwenty-two studies met our inclusion criteria, with fifteen (68%) published within the last two years. However, publicly available annotated data is still scarce, and we found only six studies that made the annotations used publicly available, making system performance comparisons difficult. In terms of algorithms, supervised classification techniques to detect posts containing ADR mentions, and lexicon-based approaches for extraction of ADR mentions from texts have been the most popular.

conclusionOur review suggests that interest in the utilization of the vast amounts of available social media data for ADR monitoring is increasing. In terms of sources, both health-related and general social media data have been used for ADR detection-while health-related sources tend to contain higher proportions of relevant data, the volume of data from general social media websites is significantly higher. There is still very limited amount of annotated data publicly available , and, as indicated by the promising results obtained by recent supervised learning approaches, there is a strong need to make such data available to the research community.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsPharmacovigilanceSocial MediaHumansInternetMEDLINEPublic HealthAdverse drug reactionPharmacovigilanceSocial media

Identifiers

PMID25720841
PMCPMC4408239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.