ArticleScientific reports2015
Self-similarity of human protein interaction networks: a novel strategy of distinguishing proteins.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The successful determination of reliable protein interaction networks (PINs) in several species in the post-genomic era has hitherto facilitated the quest to understanding systems and structural properties of such networks. It is envisaged that a clearer understanding of their intrinsic topological properties would elucidate evolutionary and biological topography of organisms. This, in turn, may inform the understanding of diseases' aetiology. By analysing sub-networks that are induced in various layers identified by zones defined as distance from central proteins, we show that zones of human PINs display self-similarity patterns. What is observed at a global level is repeated at lower levels of inducement. Furthermore, it is observed that these levels of strength point to refinement and specialisations in these layers. This may point to the fact that various levels of representations in the self-similarity phenomenon offer a way of measuring and distinguishing the importance of proteins in the network. To consolidate our findings, we have also considered a gene co-expression network and a class of gene regulatory networks in the same framework. In all cases, the phenomenon is significantly evident. In particular, the truly unbiased regulatory networks show finer level of articulation of self-similarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.